This paper studies the relation between persuasive argumentation and the speaker's epistemic attitude. Dung-style abstract argumentation and dynamic epistemic logic provide the necessary tools to characterize the notion of persuasion. Within abstract argumentation, persuasive argumentation has been previously studied from a game-theoretic perspective. These approaches are blind to the fact that, in real-life situations, the epistemic attitude of the speaker determines which set of arguments will be disclosed by her in the context of a persuasive dialogue. This work is a first step to fill this gap. For this purpose we extend one of the logics of Schwarzentruber et al. with dynamic operators, designed to capture communicative phenomena. A complete axiomatization for the new logic via reduction axioms is provided. Within the new framework, a distinction between actual persuasion and persuasion from the speaker's perspective is made. Finally, we explore the relationship between the two notions.
Persuasive Argumentation and Epistemic Attitudes
Proietti Carlo;
2020
Abstract
This paper studies the relation between persuasive argumentation and the speaker's epistemic attitude. Dung-style abstract argumentation and dynamic epistemic logic provide the necessary tools to characterize the notion of persuasion. Within abstract argumentation, persuasive argumentation has been previously studied from a game-theoretic perspective. These approaches are blind to the fact that, in real-life situations, the epistemic attitude of the speaker determines which set of arguments will be disclosed by her in the context of a persuasive dialogue. This work is a first step to fill this gap. For this purpose we extend one of the logics of Schwarzentruber et al. with dynamic operators, designed to capture communicative phenomena. A complete axiomatization for the new logic via reduction axioms is provided. Within the new framework, a distinction between actual persuasion and persuasion from the speaker's perspective is made. Finally, we explore the relationship between the two notions.| Campo DC | Valore | Lingua |
|---|---|---|
| dc.authority.people | Proietti Carlo | it |
| dc.authority.people | YusteGinel Antonio | it |
| dc.collection.id.s | 71c7200a-7c5f-4e83-8d57-d3d2ba88f40d | * |
| dc.collection.name | 04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno | * |
| dc.contributor.appartenenza | Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC | * |
| dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi | 918 | * |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024/02/20 08:37:11 | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024/02/20 08:37:11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
| dc.description.abstracteng | This paper studies the relation between persuasive argumentation and the speaker's epistemic attitude. Dung-style abstract argumentation and dynamic epistemic logic provide the necessary tools to characterize the notion of persuasion. Within abstract argumentation, persuasive argumentation has been previously studied from a game-theoretic perspective. These approaches are blind to the fact that, in real-life situations, the epistemic attitude of the speaker determines which set of arguments will be disclosed by her in the context of a persuasive dialogue. This work is a first step to fill this gap. For this purpose we extend one of the logics of Schwarzentruber et al. with dynamic operators, designed to capture communicative phenomena. A complete axiomatization for the new logic via reduction axioms is provided. Within the new framework, a distinction between actual persuasion and persuasion from the speaker's perspective is made. Finally, we explore the relationship between the two notions. | - |
| dc.description.affiliations | Lund Univ; Univ Amsterdam; Univ Malaga | - |
| dc.description.allpeople | Proietti, Carlo; Yusteginel, Antonio | - |
| dc.description.allpeopleoriginal | Proietti, Carlo; Yuste-Ginel, Antonio | - |
| dc.description.fulltext | none | en |
| dc.description.numberofauthors | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-38808-9_7 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-030-38807-2 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000654898800007 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85079092188 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/459221 | - |
| dc.language.iso | eng | - |
| dc.relation.conferencedate | 07/10/2019 | - |
| dc.relation.conferencename | DALI 2019 | - |
| dc.relation.firstpage | 104 | - |
| dc.relation.lastpage | 123 | - |
| dc.relation.numberofpages | 20 | - |
| dc.relation.volume | 12005 | - |
| dc.subject.keywords | Argumentation frameworks | - |
| dc.subject.keywords | Dynamic Epistemic Logic | - |
| dc.subject.keywords | Persuasion and argument labellings | - |
| dc.subject.singlekeyword | Argumentation frameworks | * |
| dc.subject.singlekeyword | Dynamic Epistemic Logic | * |
| dc.subject.singlekeyword | Persuasion and argument labellings | * |
| dc.title | Persuasive Argumentation and Epistemic Attitudes | en |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject | - |
| dc.type.full | 04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno | it |
| dc.type.miur | 273 | - |
| dc.ugov.descaux1 | 483663 | - |
| iris.isi.extIssued | 2020 | - |
| iris.isi.extTitle | Persuasive Argumentation and Epistemic Attitudes | - |
| iris.isi.metadataErrorDescription | 0 | - |
| iris.isi.metadataErrorType | ERROR_NO_MATCH | - |
| iris.isi.metadataStatus | ERROR | - |
| iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate | 2025/02/11 15:25:58 | * |
| iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond | 1739283958900 | * |
| iris.scopus.extIssued | 2020 | - |
| iris.scopus.extTitle | Persuasive Argumentation and Epistemic Attitudes | - |
| iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusDate | 2024/06/22 23:35:06 | * |
| iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusMillisecond | 1719092106966 | * |
| iris.sitodocente.maxattempts | 3 | - |
| iris.unpaywall.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-38808-9_7 | * |
| iris.unpaywall.isoa | false | * |
| iris.unpaywall.journalisindoaj | false | * |
| iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModified | 14/02/2025 19:05:57 | - |
| iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModifiedMillisecond | 1739556357922 | - |
| iris.unpaywall.oastatus | closed | * |
| isi.authority.anceserie | LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE###0302-9743 | * |
| isi.category | EX | * |
| isi.category | QL | * |
| isi.contributor.affiliation | Lund University | - |
| isi.contributor.affiliation | Universidad de Malaga | - |
| isi.contributor.country | Sweden | - |
| isi.contributor.country | Spain | - |
| isi.contributor.name | Carlo | - |
| isi.contributor.name | Antonio | - |
| isi.contributor.researcherId | DLT-4783-2022 | - |
| isi.contributor.researcherId | AHA-6798-2022 | - |
| isi.contributor.subaffiliation | - | |
| isi.contributor.subaffiliation | - | |
| isi.contributor.surname | Proietti | - |
| isi.contributor.surname | Yuste-Ginel | - |
| isi.date.issued | 2020 | * |
| isi.description.allpeopleoriginal | Proietti, C; Yuste-Ginel, A; | * |
| isi.document.type | Proceedings Paper | * |
| isi.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-38808-9_7 | * |
| isi.identifier.eissn | 1611-3349 | * |
| isi.identifier.isi | WOS:000654898800007 | * |
| isi.journal.journaltitle | DYNAMIC LOGIC: NEW TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS, DALI 2019 | * |
| isi.journal.journaltitleabbrev | LECT NOTES COMPUT SC | * |
| isi.language.original | English | * |
| isi.publisher.place | GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND | * |
| isi.relation.firstpage | 104 | * |
| isi.relation.lastpage | 123 | * |
| scopus.authority.anceserie | LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE###0302-9743 | * |
| scopus.category | 2614 | * |
| scopus.category | 1700 | * |
| scopus.contributor.affiliation | University of Amsterdam | - |
| scopus.contributor.affiliation | University of Málaga | - |
| scopus.contributor.afid | 60002483 | - |
| scopus.contributor.afid | 60003662 | - |
| scopus.contributor.auid | 35148455900 | - |
| scopus.contributor.auid | 57214781588 | - |
| scopus.contributor.country | Netherlands | - |
| scopus.contributor.country | Spain | - |
| scopus.contributor.dptid | - | |
| scopus.contributor.dptid | - | |
| scopus.contributor.name | Carlo | - |
| scopus.contributor.name | Antonio | - |
| scopus.contributor.subaffiliation | ILLC; | - |
| scopus.contributor.subaffiliation | - | |
| scopus.contributor.surname | Proietti | - |
| scopus.contributor.surname | Yuste-Ginel | - |
| scopus.date.issued | 2020 | * |
| scopus.description.abstracteng | This paper studies the relation between persuasive argumentation and the speaker’s epistemic attitude. Dung-style abstract argumentation and dynamic epistemic logic provide the necessary tools to characterize the notion of persuasion. Within abstract argumentation, persuasive argumentation has been previously studied from a game-theoretic perspective. These approaches are blind to the fact that, in real-life situations, the epistemic attitude of the speaker determines which set of arguments will be disclosed by her in the context of a persuasive dialogue. This work is a first step to fill this gap. For this purpose we extend one of the logics of Schwarzentruber et al. with dynamic operators, designed to capture communicative phenomena. A complete axiomatization for the new logic via reduction axioms is provided. Within the new framework, a distinction between actual persuasion and persuasion from the speaker’s perspective is made. Finally, we explore the relationship between the two notions. | * |
| scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal | Proietti C.; Yuste-Ginel A. | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.authority.anceserie | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.publisher.name | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.subject.keywords | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.relation.conferencedate | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.description.abstracteng | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.relation.conferencename | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.identifier.isbn | * |
| scopus.differences | scopus.relation.conferenceplace | * |
| scopus.document.type | cp | * |
| scopus.document.types | cp | * |
| scopus.funding.funders | 100010661 - Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; 501100000780 - European Commission; 501100002335 - Sveriges Riksbanken; | * |
| scopus.funding.ids | 748421; P16-0596:1; | * |
| scopus.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-38808-9_7 | * |
| scopus.identifier.eissn | 1611-3349 | * |
| scopus.identifier.isbn | 9783030388072 | * |
| scopus.identifier.pui | 630859762 | * |
| scopus.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85079092188 | * |
| scopus.journal.sourceid | 25674 | * |
| scopus.language.iso | eng | * |
| scopus.publisher.name | Springer | * |
| scopus.relation.conferencedate | 2019 | * |
| scopus.relation.conferencename | 2nd International Workshop on Dynamic Logic, DALI 2019 | * |
| scopus.relation.conferenceplace | prt | * |
| scopus.relation.firstpage | 104 | * |
| scopus.relation.lastpage | 123 | * |
| scopus.relation.volume | 12005 | * |
| scopus.subject.keywords | Argumentation frameworks; Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Persuasion and argument labellings; | * |
| scopus.title | Persuasive Argumentation and Epistemic Attitudes | * |
| scopus.titleeng | Persuasive Argumentation and Epistemic Attitudes | * |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno | |
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
