The chapter compares some recent developments in the representation and prediction of the dynamics of diversity - i.e., its production and maintenance in nonequilibrium systems - in the social sciences (at the case of cultural diversity) and in ecology (biodiversity). Advancements in the modeling of multilayered networks, together with new enabling technologies, have lately shifted the focus in both fields on "higher order" interactions as an additional layer of complexity which must be taken into account to understand these dynamics. These developments confirm the analytic and heuristic fertility of the systemic approach, as providing a common set of tools for formalizing complex adaptive systems, but they also highlight deeply entrenched differences between these two typologies of systems, ultimately driven by the distinct forces, forms of agency and relevant reference environment. The broader scope of the present comparative analysis of higher order interactions in social science and ecology is therefore to revive the original antireductionist stance of System Theory, as the precondition for a pluralist integration of phenomena belonging to ontologically and epistemologically irreducible levels, for a more effective management of the greater complexity driven by their interlacing, and, last but not least, for better counteracting the danger of the loss of diversity to which both systems are increasingly exposed.

Loin de l'équilibre. Dynamiques de la diversité en écologie et en sociologie

Caianiello S
2023

Abstract

The chapter compares some recent developments in the representation and prediction of the dynamics of diversity - i.e., its production and maintenance in nonequilibrium systems - in the social sciences (at the case of cultural diversity) and in ecology (biodiversity). Advancements in the modeling of multilayered networks, together with new enabling technologies, have lately shifted the focus in both fields on "higher order" interactions as an additional layer of complexity which must be taken into account to understand these dynamics. These developments confirm the analytic and heuristic fertility of the systemic approach, as providing a common set of tools for formalizing complex adaptive systems, but they also highlight deeply entrenched differences between these two typologies of systems, ultimately driven by the distinct forces, forms of agency and relevant reference environment. The broader scope of the present comparative analysis of higher order interactions in social science and ecology is therefore to revive the original antireductionist stance of System Theory, as the precondition for a pluralist integration of phenomena belonging to ontologically and epistemologically irreducible levels, for a more effective management of the greater complexity driven by their interlacing, and, last but not least, for better counteracting the danger of the loss of diversity to which both systems are increasingly exposed.
2023
Istituto per la Storia del Pensiero Filosofico e scientifico moderno - ISPF
978-2-37361-406-0
Le chapitre compare certains développements récents dans la représentation et la prédiction de la dynamique de la diversité - à savoir sa production et son maintien dans des systèmes hors équilibre - dans les sciences sociales (dans le cas de la diversité culturelle) et en écologie (biodiversité). Les avancées dans la modélisation des réseaux multicouches, ainsi que les nouvelles technologies habilitantes, ont récemment déplacé l'attention dans les deux domaines sur les interactions « d'ordre supérieur », comme une couche supplémentaire de complexité qui doit être prise en compte pour comprendre cette dynamique. Ces développements confirment la fertilité analytique et heuristique de l'approche systémique, qui fournit un ensemble commun d'outils pour formaliser les systèmes adaptatifs complexes, mais ils mettent également en évidence des différences profondément ancrées entre ces deux typologies de systèmes, finalement régies par des forces distinctes, des formes d'agentivité et un environnement de référence pertinent. La portée plus large de la présente analyse comparative des interactions d'ordre supérieur en sciences sociales et en écologie est donc de raviver la position antiréductionniste originale de la théorie des systèmes, en tant que condition préalable à une intégration pluraliste de phénomènes appartenant à des niveaux ontologiquement et épistémologiquement irréductibles, pour une gestion plus efficace de la complexité plus grande induite par leur entrelacement, et, enfin et non moins important, pour mieux contrer le danger de la perte de diversité à laquelle les deux systèmes sont de plus en plus exposés.
diversity
sociology
ecology
complex adaptive systems
nonequilibrium
higher order interactions
multilayered networks
modeling
reductionism
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/460057
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact