An important biomarker of oxidative damage in cellular DNA is the formation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-20-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG). Although several methods are available for the biochemicalanalysis of this molecule, its determination at the single cell level may provide significantadvantages when investigating the influence of cell heterogeneity and cell type in the DNA damageresponse. to. For this purpose, antibodies recognizing 8-oxodG are available; however, detectionwith the glycoprotein avidin has also been proposed because of a structural similarity between itsnatural ligand biotin and 8-oxodG. Whether the two procedures are equivalent in terms of reliabilityand sensitivity is not clear. In this study, we compared the immunofluorescence determination of8-oxodG in cellular DNA using the monoclonal antibody N45.1 and labeling using avidin conjugatedwith the fluorochrome Alexa Fluor488 (AF488). Oxidative DNA damage was induced in different celltypes by treatment with potassium bromate (KBrO3), a chemical inducer of reactive oxygen species(ROS). By using increasing concentrations of KBrO3, as well as different reaction conditions, ourresults indicate that the monoclonal antibody N45.1 provides a specificity of 8-oxodG labeling greaterthan that attained with avidin-AF488. These findings suggest that immunofluorescence techniquesare best suited to the in situ analysis of 8-oxodG as a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage.

Single Cell Determination of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine by Fluorescence Techniques: Antibody vs. Avidin Labeling

Ticli G;Prosperi E
2023

Abstract

An important biomarker of oxidative damage in cellular DNA is the formation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-20-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG). Although several methods are available for the biochemicalanalysis of this molecule, its determination at the single cell level may provide significantadvantages when investigating the influence of cell heterogeneity and cell type in the DNA damageresponse. to. For this purpose, antibodies recognizing 8-oxodG are available; however, detectionwith the glycoprotein avidin has also been proposed because of a structural similarity between itsnatural ligand biotin and 8-oxodG. Whether the two procedures are equivalent in terms of reliabilityand sensitivity is not clear. In this study, we compared the immunofluorescence determination of8-oxodG in cellular DNA using the monoclonal antibody N45.1 and labeling using avidin conjugatedwith the fluorochrome Alexa Fluor488 (AF488). Oxidative DNA damage was induced in different celltypes by treatment with potassium bromate (KBrO3), a chemical inducer of reactive oxygen species(ROS). By using increasing concentrations of KBrO3, as well as different reaction conditions, ourresults indicate that the monoclonal antibody N45.1 provides a specificity of 8-oxodG labeling greaterthan that attained with avidin-AF488. These findings suggest that immunofluorescence techniquesare best suited to the in situ analysis of 8-oxodG as a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage.
2023
Istituto di Genetica Molecolare "Luigi Luca Cavalli Sforza"
78-dihydro-8-oxo-20-deoxyguanosine
oxidative DNA damage
immunofluorescence
avidin binding
oxidative DNA damage
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_481927-doc_198266.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Single Cell Determination of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine by Fluorescence Techniques: Antibody vs. Avidin Labeling
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.44 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/460138
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact