Social dilemmas play an important role in the study of cooperative behaviours. In this experiment we tested the strategies adopted by tufted capuchin monkeys, Sapajus spp., when faced with a cooperative situation involving a conflict of interest, simulating a Snowdrift game. We tested 12 capuchin monkeys (six dyads) in two experimental conditions: Snowdrift (cooperation) and Competition. Monkeys had the opportunity to pull a string to move a rotating bar and obtain a reward while delivering a different reward to their partner. Pulling in the Snowdrift condition delivered a smaller reward to the individual pulling the string and a larger reward to the partner, while the opposite happened in the Competition condition. If neither monkey pulled within 30 s, neither received a reward. Monkeys were also individually tested in a battery of self-control tasks. Capuchin monkeys successfully coordinated (i.e. obtained a reward) in 100% of trials and flexibly adapted their behaviour to the different experimental conditions, by pulling earlier in the Competition and later in the Snowdrift condition. Dominance rank and self-control had no effect on the latencies to pull in either experimental condition. No evidence of any alternation strategy was observed. Our results suggest that capuchin monkeys can solve a conflict of interest without engaging in complex calculations. (c) 2022 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Behaviour of tufted capuchin monkeys in a snowdrift game: is there a role for self-control?
Addessi Elsa;Schino Gabriele
2023
Abstract
Social dilemmas play an important role in the study of cooperative behaviours. In this experiment we tested the strategies adopted by tufted capuchin monkeys, Sapajus spp., when faced with a cooperative situation involving a conflict of interest, simulating a Snowdrift game. We tested 12 capuchin monkeys (six dyads) in two experimental conditions: Snowdrift (cooperation) and Competition. Monkeys had the opportunity to pull a string to move a rotating bar and obtain a reward while delivering a different reward to their partner. Pulling in the Snowdrift condition delivered a smaller reward to the individual pulling the string and a larger reward to the partner, while the opposite happened in the Competition condition. If neither monkey pulled within 30 s, neither received a reward. Monkeys were also individually tested in a battery of self-control tasks. Capuchin monkeys successfully coordinated (i.e. obtained a reward) in 100% of trials and flexibly adapted their behaviour to the different experimental conditions, by pulling earlier in the Competition and later in the Snowdrift condition. Dominance rank and self-control had no effect on the latencies to pull in either experimental condition. No evidence of any alternation strategy was observed. Our results suggest that capuchin monkeys can solve a conflict of interest without engaging in complex calculations. (c) 2022 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
prod_483837-doc_199682.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Behaviour of tufted capuchin monkeys in a Snowdrift game: is there a role for self-control?
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
730.93 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
730.93 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.