Health Impact Assessment claims to be applicable to policies, programmes and projects but relatively little work on policy has been reported. The appearance of a book on assessing the health consequences of national policies in several countries is to be warmly welcomed. The contrasting of a top down approach (assessing the health consequences of a proposed or existing policy) and a bottom up approach (starting with a health problem and working back to policy solutions for that problem) is a useful addition to our thinking on this subject. The bottom up approach chimes with the suggestions made elsewhere that impact analysis should not be a final step, which is only undertaken when a policy has been finalised, but should be an integral part of the whole policy making process. Throughout the book emphasises how causal diagrams and full chain thinking help to unpick the consequences of policy. The approach in RAPID relies very heavily on epidemiological thinking and pays little attention to the stakeholder participation, which is emphasised in other approaches

Application of RAPID Guidance on an International Policy

L Cori;
2014

Abstract

Health Impact Assessment claims to be applicable to policies, programmes and projects but relatively little work on policy has been reported. The appearance of a book on assessing the health consequences of national policies in several countries is to be warmly welcomed. The contrasting of a top down approach (assessing the health consequences of a proposed or existing policy) and a bottom up approach (starting with a health problem and working back to policy solutions for that problem) is a useful addition to our thinking on this subject. The bottom up approach chimes with the suggestions made elsewhere that impact analysis should not be a final step, which is only undertaken when a policy has been finalised, but should be an integral part of the whole policy making process. Throughout the book emphasises how causal diagrams and full chain thinking help to unpick the consequences of policy. The approach in RAPID relies very heavily on epidemiological thinking and pays little attention to the stakeholder participation, which is emphasised in other approaches
2014
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
978-1-4614-8597-1
policy risk assessment
health risk
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_483843-doc_199687.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Application of RAPID Guidance on an International Policy
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 250.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
250.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/461516
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact