: A well-corroborated numerical methodology ensuring reproducibility in the modeling of pharmaceutical aerosols deposition in the respiratory system via CFD-DEM simulations within the RANS framework is currently missing. Often, inadequately clarified assumptions and approximations and the lack of evidences on their quantitative impact on the simulated deposition phenomenology, make a direct comparison among the different theoretical studies and the limited number of experiments a very challenging task. Here, with the ultimate goal of providing a critical analysis of some crucial computational aspects of aerosols deposition, we address the issues of velocity fluctuations propagation in the upper intra-thoracic airways and of the persistence of secondary flows using the SimInhale reference benchmark. We complement the investigation by describing how methodologies used to drive the flow through a truncated lung model may affect numerical results and how small discrepancies are observed in velocity profiles when comparing simulations based on different meshing strategies.
A critical analysis of the CFD-DEM simulation of pharmaceutical aerosols deposition in upper intra-thoracic airways: Considerations on air flow
Vanossi, A.;
2024
Abstract
: A well-corroborated numerical methodology ensuring reproducibility in the modeling of pharmaceutical aerosols deposition in the respiratory system via CFD-DEM simulations within the RANS framework is currently missing. Often, inadequately clarified assumptions and approximations and the lack of evidences on their quantitative impact on the simulated deposition phenomenology, make a direct comparison among the different theoretical studies and the limited number of experiments a very challenging task. Here, with the ultimate goal of providing a critical analysis of some crucial computational aspects of aerosols deposition, we address the issues of velocity fluctuations propagation in the upper intra-thoracic airways and of the persistence of secondary flows using the SimInhale reference benchmark. We complement the investigation by describing how methodologies used to drive the flow through a truncated lung model may affect numerical results and how small discrepancies are observed in velocity profiles when comparing simulations based on different meshing strategies.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.