Flexibility of brain dynamics is increased and predicts clinical impairment in relapsing–remitting but not in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Large-scale brain activity has long been investigated under the erroneous assumption of stationarity. Nowadays, we know that resting-state functional connectivity is characterized by aperiodic, scale-free bursts of activity (i.e. neuronal avalanches) that intermittently recruit different brain regions. These different patterns of activity represent a measure of brain flexibility, whose reduction has been found to predict clinical impairment in multiple neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain flexibility has been recently found increased in multiple sclerosis, but its relationship with clinical disability remains elusive. Also, potential differences in brain dynamics according to the multiple sclerosis clinical phenotypes remain unexplored so far. We performed a brain dynamics study quantifying brain flexibility utilizing the ‘functional repertoire’ (i.e. the number of configurations of active brain areas) through source reconstruction of magnetoencephalography signals in a cohort of 25 multiple sclerosis patients (10 relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis and 15 secondary progressive multiple sclerosis) and 25 healthy controls. Multiple sclerosis patients showed a greater number of unique reconfigurations at fast time scales as compared with healthy controls. This difference was mainly driven by the relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis phenotype, whereas no significant differences in brain dynamics were found between secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and healthy controls. Brain flexibility also showed a different predictive power on clinical disability according to the multiple sclerosis type. For the first time, we investigated brain dynamics in multiple sclerosis patients through high temporal resolution techniques, unveiling differences in brain flexibility according to the multiple sclerosis phenotype and its relationship with clinical disability.