In this paper two machine learning algorithms, decision trees (DT) and Hamming clustering (HC), are compared in building approximate reliability expression (RE). The main idea is to employ a classification technique, trained on a restricted subset of data, to produce an estimate of the RE, which provides reasonably accurate values of the reliability. The experiments show that although both methods yield excellent predictions, the HC procedure achieves better results with respect to the DT algorithm.

Empirical models based on machine learning techniques for determining approximated reliability expressions

M Muselli
2004

Abstract

In this paper two machine learning algorithms, decision trees (DT) and Hamming clustering (HC), are compared in building approximate reliability expression (RE). The main idea is to employ a classification technique, trained on a restricted subset of data, to produce an estimate of the RE, which provides reasonably accurate values of the reliability. The experiments show that although both methods yield excellent predictions, the HC procedure achieves better results with respect to the DT algorithm.
2004
Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni - IEIIT
Network reliability evaluation
Reliability expression
Rule generation
Decision tree
Hamming clustering
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/50076
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact