Starting with a formal definition of the process of scholarly editing, we further formalize it by exploiting Category Theory. We then apply this formal model to automated Natural Language Processing tools, highlighting the parallelism between composition and associativity and linguistic tool pipelines. We then discuss the notion of interoperability between tools. Finally, we propose some future improvements to the proposed formal model.
Document Analysis and Philological Operations. Is Category Theory a suitable approach?
Gratta, Riccardo Del
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Zenzaro, SimoneWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Grosso, Angelo DelWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Boschetti, FedericoWriting – Original Draft Preparation
2023
Abstract
Starting with a formal definition of the process of scholarly editing, we further formalize it by exploiting Category Theory. We then apply this formal model to automated Natural Language Processing tools, highlighting the parallelism between composition and associativity and linguistic tool pipelines. We then discuss the notion of interoperability between tools. Finally, we propose some future improvements to the proposed formal model.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Document_Analysis_and_Philological_Operations._Is_Category_Theory_a_suitable_approach.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
304.89 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
304.89 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
