This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of membrane technologies for hydrogen-related processes in aviation, specifically focusing on hydrogen production, hydrogen separation, and fuel cells. As aviation seeks to transition to cleaner energy solutions, the selection of appropriate membranes is critical for ensuring efficiency and sustainability. The research utilizes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to systematically assess membrane alternatives based on key criteria: economic factors, environmental impact, technical performance, and technological maturity. By conducting pairwise comparisons and detailed matrix calculations, this study establishes the relative importance of sub-criteria and ranks membrane types for each hydrogen-related application. The analysis identifies Nonporous Dense Films as the most effective membrane for hydrogen production, due to their balance of cost and technical performance. For hydrogen separation, Ceramic and Metal Membranes are determined to be the optimal choice, offering superior durability, hydrogen permeability, and thermal stability. In fuel cell applications, Electrically Charged Membranes are found to be the most suitable for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs), while Ceramic and Metal Membranes excel in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs). The outcomes of this study not only highlight the most suitable membranes for different aviation hydrogen processes but also offer a strategic framework for decision-makers. By identifying the key factors driving membrane selection, this research contributes to advancing hydrogen adoption in aviation, facilitating the development of efficient, low-emission technologies for the future of sustainable air travel.

Evaluating membranes for hydrogen storage and utilization in next-generation aviation systems

Iulianelli A.
Penultimo
Conceptualization
;
2024

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of membrane technologies for hydrogen-related processes in aviation, specifically focusing on hydrogen production, hydrogen separation, and fuel cells. As aviation seeks to transition to cleaner energy solutions, the selection of appropriate membranes is critical for ensuring efficiency and sustainability. The research utilizes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to systematically assess membrane alternatives based on key criteria: economic factors, environmental impact, technical performance, and technological maturity. By conducting pairwise comparisons and detailed matrix calculations, this study establishes the relative importance of sub-criteria and ranks membrane types for each hydrogen-related application. The analysis identifies Nonporous Dense Films as the most effective membrane for hydrogen production, due to their balance of cost and technical performance. For hydrogen separation, Ceramic and Metal Membranes are determined to be the optimal choice, offering superior durability, hydrogen permeability, and thermal stability. In fuel cell applications, Electrically Charged Membranes are found to be the most suitable for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs), while Ceramic and Metal Membranes excel in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs). The outcomes of this study not only highlight the most suitable membranes for different aviation hydrogen processes but also offer a strategic framework for decision-makers. By identifying the key factors driving membrane selection, this research contributes to advancing hydrogen adoption in aviation, facilitating the development of efficient, low-emission technologies for the future of sustainable air travel.
2024
Istituto per la Tecnologia delle Membrane - ITM
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Fuel cells; Hydrogen membranes; Hydrogen separation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ayar et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.77 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.77 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/517423
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact