This study investigated the influence of six different loss functions on Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) ship classification accuracy across two datasets. Kullback-Leibler Divergence Loss emerged with the highest average accuracy (69.5%), followed by L1 Loss (69.12%) and Focal Loss(68.4%). Interestingly, L1 and Focal Loss exhibited contrasting performance across datasets, suggesting potential data-specific suitability for certain functions. These findings highlight the importance of considering data characteristics and task requirements when selecting loss functions to optimize SAR ship classification performance.
Testing a SAR-based ship classifier with different loss functions
Reggiannini M.;Moroni D.
2024
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of six different loss functions on Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) ship classification accuracy across two datasets. Kullback-Leibler Divergence Loss emerged with the highest average accuracy (69.5%), followed by L1 Loss (69.12%) and Focal Loss(68.4%). Interestingly, L1 and Focal Loss exhibited contrasting performance across datasets, suggesting potential data-specific suitability for certain functions. These findings highlight the importance of considering data characteristics and task requirements when selecting loss functions to optimize SAR ship classification performance.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
TestingSARbasedShipClassifierwithDifferentLossFunctions.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Testing a SAR-based ship classifier with different loss functions
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
477.77 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
477.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.