The kinematic-wave and diffusive-wave approximations were investigated for unsteady overland flow due to spatially varying rainfall excess. Three types of boundary conditions were adopted: zero flow at the upstream end, and critical flow and zero depth-gradient at the downstream end. Errors were derived by comparing the dimensionless profiles of the flow depth over the plane with those computed from the dynamic-wave solution. It was found that the mean errors for both the approximations were independent of the type of rainfall excess distribution for , where K is the kinematic- wave number and F0 is the Froude number. Therefore, the regions ( F0) where the kinematic-wave and diffusive-wave solutions would be fairly accurate and for any distribution of spatially varying rainfall, were characterized. The kinematic-wave approximation was reasonably accurate, with a mean error of less than 5% and for the critical depth at downstream end, for with F0¡Ü1; if the rainfall excess was concentrated in a portion of the plane, the field where the kinematic-wave solution was found accurate, it was more limited and characterized for with F0¡Ü1. The diffusive-wave solution was in good agreement with the dynamic-wave solution with a mean error of less than 5%, in the flow depth, for with F0¡Ü1; for rainfall excess concentrated in a portion of the plane, the accuracy of the diffusion wave solution was in a region more restricted and defined for with F0¡Ü1. For zero-depth gradient at downstream end, the accuracy field of the kinematic-wave was found more large and characterized for with F0¡Ü1; for rainfall excess concentrated in a portion of the plane, the region was smaller and defined for with F0¡Ü1. The diffusive-wave solution was found accurate in the region defined for , whereas for rainfall excess concentrated in a portion of the plane, the field of accuracy was for with F0¡Ü1. The lower limits of the regions, defined on , can be considered generally valid for both approximations, but for F0<1 smaller lower limits were also characterized. Finally, the accuracy of these approximations was significantly influenced by the downstream boundary condition.
Accuracy of kinematic wave and diffusion wave for spatial-varying rainfall excess over a plane
Moramarco T;
2002
Abstract
The kinematic-wave and diffusive-wave approximations were investigated for unsteady overland flow due to spatially varying rainfall excess. Three types of boundary conditions were adopted: zero flow at the upstream end, and critical flow and zero depth-gradient at the downstream end. Errors were derived by comparing the dimensionless profiles of the flow depth over the plane with those computed from the dynamic-wave solution. It was found that the mean errors for both the approximations were independent of the type of rainfall excess distribution for , where K is the kinematic- wave number and F0 is the Froude number. Therefore, the regions ( F0) where the kinematic-wave and diffusive-wave solutions would be fairly accurate and for any distribution of spatially varying rainfall, were characterized. The kinematic-wave approximation was reasonably accurate, with a mean error of less than 5% and for the critical depth at downstream end, for with F0¡Ü1; if the rainfall excess was concentrated in a portion of the plane, the field where the kinematic-wave solution was found accurate, it was more limited and characterized for with F0¡Ü1. The diffusive-wave solution was in good agreement with the dynamic-wave solution with a mean error of less than 5%, in the flow depth, for with F0¡Ü1; for rainfall excess concentrated in a portion of the plane, the accuracy of the diffusion wave solution was in a region more restricted and defined for with F0¡Ü1. For zero-depth gradient at downstream end, the accuracy field of the kinematic-wave was found more large and characterized for with F0¡Ü1; for rainfall excess concentrated in a portion of the plane, the region was smaller and defined for with F0¡Ü1. The diffusive-wave solution was found accurate in the region defined for , whereas for rainfall excess concentrated in a portion of the plane, the field of accuracy was for with F0¡Ü1. The lower limits of the regions, defined on , can be considered generally valid for both approximations, but for F0<1 smaller lower limits were also characterized. Finally, the accuracy of these approximations was significantly influenced by the downstream boundary condition.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
