Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a common tool to assess cognitive and functional abilities in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is a structured interview that encompasses evaluation across six specific domains. However, AD's initial stages may not lead to a uniform cognitive decline across all cognitive domains. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic utility of individual CDR domains in predicting the progression of AD dementia over a five-year longitudinal period among an elderly cohort. Initially, a longitudinal-cluster analysis was conducted using five-point longitudinal data to categorize subjects into clusters based on the progression of CDR domains during the follow-up. Then, a statistical analysis was performed on the identified clusters to ascertain whether, at the baseline, patients exhibiting stability have different profiles about CDR domains compared to patients who converted to an AD during the whole follow-up period. Results show that the risk of AD progression was mainly related to problems with Orientation and Judgment at the baseline.
Clustering of longitudinal Clinical Dementia Rating data to identify predictors of Alzheimer's disease progression
Ribino, Patrizia
;Paragliola, Giovanni;Napoli, Claudia Di;Mannone, Maria;
2024
Abstract
Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a common tool to assess cognitive and functional abilities in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is a structured interview that encompasses evaluation across six specific domains. However, AD's initial stages may not lead to a uniform cognitive decline across all cognitive domains. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic utility of individual CDR domains in predicting the progression of AD dementia over a five-year longitudinal period among an elderly cohort. Initially, a longitudinal-cluster analysis was conducted using five-point longitudinal data to categorize subjects into clusters based on the progression of CDR domains during the follow-up. Then, a statistical analysis was performed on the identified clusters to ascertain whether, at the baseline, patients exhibiting stability have different profiles about CDR domains compared to patients who converted to an AD during the whole follow-up period. Results show that the risk of AD progression was mainly related to problems with Orientation and Judgment at the baseline.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1877050924033519-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
943.76 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
943.76 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.