Seed phenotyping through non-destructive imaging techniques may be vital for obtaining seed quality and viability information, aiding in plant species conservation and de-extinction. We used X-ray microtomography followed by a germination test on a seed sample of the rare and threatened Hieracium australe subsp. australe to compare qualitative and quantitative morphological traits as predictors of germination capacity. Five qualitative classes based on embryo structure integrity were assigned; eighteen morphometric parameters were defined via 3D image analysis examining outer seed shape and internal embryo structure; “germinated,” “ungerminated” and “dead” outcomes were recorded. The multinomial logistic model applied to the qualitative classes allowed to correctly classify 72.7% of “germinated” seeds but failed to predict “ungerminated” and “dead” seeds. Univariate analysis of morphometric parameters showed no significant differences in mean values among the three germination outcomes. However, unsuccessful germination was associated with smaller seed size, increased pericarp thickness, and higher radicle-to-seed length ratio. Multivariate discriminant analysis of eleven uncorrelated morphometric parameters highlighted "mean embryo-pericarp distance" as indicative of germination capacity specific to Hieracium, while "embryo “porosity" and “embryo surface/volume ratio” were associated with “dead” seeds obtaining an overall correct classification of 72.7% of the “germinated” seeds and 70.0% of the “dead” ones.

Qualitative vs. quantitative morphology of seeds of an Italian critically endangered Hawkweed as predictor of germination capacity.

Gargiulo L.;Napolitano A. G.;Mele G.
;
2025

Abstract

Seed phenotyping through non-destructive imaging techniques may be vital for obtaining seed quality and viability information, aiding in plant species conservation and de-extinction. We used X-ray microtomography followed by a germination test on a seed sample of the rare and threatened Hieracium australe subsp. australe to compare qualitative and quantitative morphological traits as predictors of germination capacity. Five qualitative classes based on embryo structure integrity were assigned; eighteen morphometric parameters were defined via 3D image analysis examining outer seed shape and internal embryo structure; “germinated,” “ungerminated” and “dead” outcomes were recorded. The multinomial logistic model applied to the qualitative classes allowed to correctly classify 72.7% of “germinated” seeds but failed to predict “ungerminated” and “dead” seeds. Univariate analysis of morphometric parameters showed no significant differences in mean values among the three germination outcomes. However, unsuccessful germination was associated with smaller seed size, increased pericarp thickness, and higher radicle-to-seed length ratio. Multivariate discriminant analysis of eleven uncorrelated morphometric parameters highlighted "mean embryo-pericarp distance" as indicative of germination capacity specific to Hieracium, while "embryo “porosity" and “embryo surface/volume ratio” were associated with “dead” seeds obtaining an overall correct classification of 72.7% of the “germinated” seeds and 70.0% of the “dead” ones.
2025
Istituto per i Sistemi Agricoli e Forestali del Mediterraneo - ISAFOM
X-ray micro-CT, 3D imaging, seed quality, seed morphological phenotyping, discriminant analysis, multinomial logistic regression
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Qualitative vs. quantitative morphology of seeds of an Italian critically endangered Hawkweed as predictor of germination capacity.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: File pdf dell'articolo pubblicato
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.51 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/531746
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact