Ammonia decomposition is a key technology for its use as a hydrogen carrier and in the recovery of H2 from waste streams containing ammonia. The coupling of the catalytic decomposition of ammonia with an H2 permeoselective membrane improves the process by mitigating thermodynamic constraints and producing a flux of high-purity hydrogen, not requiring further separation/purification. In this study, we compare the behaviour of an eggshell catalyst 1.3 wt % Ru/Al2O3 catalyst in a packed bed reactor (PBR) and a packed bed membrane reactor (PBMR) using an ultrathin Pd membrane (3.4 μm). Tests were made at 11 bar(a) with a weight hourly space velocity of NH3 in the 0.560–1.68 L⋅g− 1 ⋅h− 1 range and temperatures of 350–400 ◦C, e.g. milder conditions than the conventional ammonia cracking catalysts. Under optimised conditions (0.56 L⋅g− 1 ⋅h− 1 , 400 ◦C, sweep gas flow 0.55 L min− 1 ), the PBMR shows excellent performance, achieving NH3 conversion, H2 productivity and recovery factor of 99%, 47 mmolH2⋅gRu − 1 ⋅min− 1 , and 94.9%, respectively. PBMR increases by ~50% the conversion rate compared to PBR. Without a sweep gas, PBMR performances are lower, even still higher than in PBR. For the first time, superior or comparable performance was demonstrated compared to similar systems using pure ammonia in terms of conversion, hydrogen recovery, H2 productivity, and Ru utilisation. These results can be further enhanced with vacuum systems to convert diluted ammonia streams into high-purity hydrogen for smallscale distributed systems and can be extended to other reactions.

Comparative analysis of hydrogen production from ammonia decomposition in membrane and packed bed reactors using diluted NH3 streams

Maccarrone D.;Italiano C.;
2024

Abstract

Ammonia decomposition is a key technology for its use as a hydrogen carrier and in the recovery of H2 from waste streams containing ammonia. The coupling of the catalytic decomposition of ammonia with an H2 permeoselective membrane improves the process by mitigating thermodynamic constraints and producing a flux of high-purity hydrogen, not requiring further separation/purification. In this study, we compare the behaviour of an eggshell catalyst 1.3 wt % Ru/Al2O3 catalyst in a packed bed reactor (PBR) and a packed bed membrane reactor (PBMR) using an ultrathin Pd membrane (3.4 μm). Tests were made at 11 bar(a) with a weight hourly space velocity of NH3 in the 0.560–1.68 L⋅g− 1 ⋅h− 1 range and temperatures of 350–400 ◦C, e.g. milder conditions than the conventional ammonia cracking catalysts. Under optimised conditions (0.56 L⋅g− 1 ⋅h− 1 , 400 ◦C, sweep gas flow 0.55 L min− 1 ), the PBMR shows excellent performance, achieving NH3 conversion, H2 productivity and recovery factor of 99%, 47 mmolH2⋅gRu − 1 ⋅min− 1 , and 94.9%, respectively. PBMR increases by ~50% the conversion rate compared to PBR. Without a sweep gas, PBMR performances are lower, even still higher than in PBR. For the first time, superior or comparable performance was demonstrated compared to similar systems using pure ammonia in terms of conversion, hydrogen recovery, H2 productivity, and Ru utilisation. These results can be further enhanced with vacuum systems to convert diluted ammonia streams into high-purity hydrogen for smallscale distributed systems and can be extended to other reactions.
2024
Istituto di Tecnologie Avanzate per l'Energia - ITAE
H2 by NH3 decomposition
NH3 cracking
NH3 as H2 carrier
Membrane reactor
Packed-bed reactor
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
52-2024-Maccarone (IntJHydrogenEnergy).pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 7.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.24 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/535320
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact