This paper presents a wearable brain–computer interface relying on neurofeedback in extended reality for the enhancement of motor imagery training. Visual and vibrotactile feedback modalities were evaluated when presented either singularly or simultaneously. Only three acquisition channels and state-of-the-art vibrotactile chest-based feedback were employed. Experimental validation was carried out with eight subjects participating in two or three sessions on different days, with 360 trials per subject per session. Neurofeedback led to statistically significant improvement in performance over the two/three sessions, thus demonstrating for the first time functionality of a motor imagery-based instrument even by using an utmost wearable electroencephalograph and a commercial gaming vibrotactile suit. In the best cases, classification accuracy exceeded 80 % with more than 20 % improvement with respect to the initial performance. No feedback modality was generally preferable across the cohort study, but it is concluded that the best feedback modality may be subject-dependent.
Visual and haptic feedback in detecting motor imagery within a wearable brain–computer interface
Donnarumma Francesco.Funding Acquisition
;
2023
Abstract
This paper presents a wearable brain–computer interface relying on neurofeedback in extended reality for the enhancement of motor imagery training. Visual and vibrotactile feedback modalities were evaluated when presented either singularly or simultaneously. Only three acquisition channels and state-of-the-art vibrotactile chest-based feedback were employed. Experimental validation was carried out with eight subjects participating in two or three sessions on different days, with 360 trials per subject per session. Neurofeedback led to statistically significant improvement in performance over the two/three sessions, thus demonstrating for the first time functionality of a motor imagery-based instrument even by using an utmost wearable electroencephalograph and a commercial gaming vibrotactile suit. In the best cases, classification accuracy exceeded 80 % with more than 20 % improvement with respect to the initial performance. No feedback modality was generally preferable across the cohort study, but it is concluded that the best feedback modality may be subject-dependent.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2022donnarummaMeasurementHaptic.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Pasquale Arpaia, Damien Coyle, Francesco Donnarumma, Antonio Esposito, Angela Natalizio, Marco Parvis, Visual and haptic feedback in detecting motor imagery within a wearable brain–computer interface, Measurement, Volume 206, 2023, 112304, ISSN 0263-2241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112304. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224122015007)
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.54 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.54 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
Measurement_MI_BCI_with_feedback.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Arpaia, P., Coyle, D., Donnarumma, F., Esposito, A., Natalizio, A., & Parvis, M. (2023). Visual and haptic feedback in detecting motor imagery within a wearable brain-computer interface. Measurement, 206, 1-9. Article 112304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112304 File pubblico: https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/files/111690067/Measurement_MI_BCI_with_feedback.pdf
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Altro tipo di licenza
Dimensione
2.38 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.38 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


