Iron isotopes are increasingly applied in Earth science fields, including cosmochemistry, geochemistry and environmental sciences. Refining non-traditional stable isotope systematics requires well-characterised isotopic reference materials to ensure accuracy and precision. Consequently, the direct comparison of data obtained from different laboratories is a key prerequisite for establishing reliable isotopic systematics. Here, we describe a new Fe isotope measurement method using multi-collector-ICP-MS. The Fe isotope ratios of widely used geological reference materials (JB-2, BHVO-2, BE-N, AGV-1 and RGM-1) were measured and new Fe isotope values for IAEA-B5 (basalt from Mount Etna, Italy) are recommended. Anion exchange chromatography was used to separate Fe from the rest of the matrix. Mass bias was corrected using a standard-sample-standard bracketing method combined with Ni-doping. Iron isotope ratios of JB-2, BHVO-2, BE-N, AGV-1 and RGM-1 show strong agreement with published values and fall within reported analytical uncertainties. Based on these results, we validate and propose delta 56Fe = 0.103 +/- 0.064 (2s) and delta 57Fe = 0.141 +/- 0.068 (2s) as recommended values for IAEA-B5. We further advocate the IAEA-B5 as a robust and complementary reference material for analytical validation and quality control in Fe isotope studies, providing both a supplement to and an alternative for established iron isotope reference materials.

Iron Isotope Ratios of IAEA B5 Basalt and Whole-Rock Reference Materials (JB-2, BHVO-2, AGV-1, BE-N and RGM-1) Determined by Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry

Di Giuseppe P.;Vezzoni S.
;
Iannini Lelarge S.;Rielli A.;Agostini S.;Dini A.
2025

Abstract

Iron isotopes are increasingly applied in Earth science fields, including cosmochemistry, geochemistry and environmental sciences. Refining non-traditional stable isotope systematics requires well-characterised isotopic reference materials to ensure accuracy and precision. Consequently, the direct comparison of data obtained from different laboratories is a key prerequisite for establishing reliable isotopic systematics. Here, we describe a new Fe isotope measurement method using multi-collector-ICP-MS. The Fe isotope ratios of widely used geological reference materials (JB-2, BHVO-2, BE-N, AGV-1 and RGM-1) were measured and new Fe isotope values for IAEA-B5 (basalt from Mount Etna, Italy) are recommended. Anion exchange chromatography was used to separate Fe from the rest of the matrix. Mass bias was corrected using a standard-sample-standard bracketing method combined with Ni-doping. Iron isotope ratios of JB-2, BHVO-2, BE-N, AGV-1 and RGM-1 show strong agreement with published values and fall within reported analytical uncertainties. Based on these results, we validate and propose delta 56Fe = 0.103 +/- 0.064 (2s) and delta 57Fe = 0.141 +/- 0.068 (2s) as recommended values for IAEA-B5. We further advocate the IAEA-B5 as a robust and complementary reference material for analytical validation and quality control in Fe isotope studies, providing both a supplement to and an alternative for established iron isotope reference materials.
2025
Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse - IGG - Sede Pisa
iron isotopes,
reference materials,
MC-ICP-MS Neptune Plus,
Ni-doping,
IAEA-B5
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DiGiuseppeEtAl(2025)_GeoStandGeoAnalRes.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Iron isotope ratios of IAEA B5 basalt and whole-rock reference materials (JB-2, BHVO-2, AGV-1, BE-N and RGM-1) Determined by Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.2 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/554861
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact