Most vaccines require multiple doses, the first to induce recognition and antibody production and subsequent doses to boost the primary response and achieve optimal protection. We show that properly prioritizing the administration of first and second doses can shift the epidemic threshold, separating the disease-free from the endemic state and potentially preventing widespread outbreaks. Assuming homogeneous mixing, we prove that at a low vaccination rate, the best strategy is to give absolute priority to first doses. In contrast, for high vaccination rates, we propose a scheduling that outperforms a first-come first-served approach. We identify the threshold that separates these two scenarios and derive the optimal prioritization scheme and interdose interval. Agent-based simulations on real and synthetic contact networks validate our findings. We provide specific guidelines for effective resource allocation, showing that adjusting the timing between the primer and booster significantly impacts epidemic outcomes and can determine whether the disease persists or disappears.

When to boost: How dose timing determines the epidemic threshold

Celestini, Alessandro;Colaiori, Francesca;Guarino, Stefano;Mastrostefano, Enrico;Pelusi, Francesca;Zastrow, Lena Rebecca
2025

Abstract

Most vaccines require multiple doses, the first to induce recognition and antibody production and subsequent doses to boost the primary response and achieve optimal protection. We show that properly prioritizing the administration of first and second doses can shift the epidemic threshold, separating the disease-free from the endemic state and potentially preventing widespread outbreaks. Assuming homogeneous mixing, we prove that at a low vaccination rate, the best strategy is to give absolute priority to first doses. In contrast, for high vaccination rates, we propose a scheduling that outperforms a first-come first-served approach. We identify the threshold that separates these two scenarios and derive the optimal prioritization scheme and interdose interval. Agent-based simulations on real and synthetic contact networks validate our findings. We provide specific guidelines for effective resource allocation, showing that adjusting the timing between the primer and booster significantly impacts epidemic outcomes and can determine whether the disease persists or disappears.
2025
Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi - ISC
Istituto Applicazioni del Calcolo ''Mauro Picone''
--
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cykd-2rjn (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: When to boost: How dose timing determines the epidemic threshold
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 559.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
559.36 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/555305
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact