Background: In a rapidly aging society, the concept of psychosocial well-being becomes increasingly relevant, independent of health. Indeed, psychosocial well-being is closely related to autonomy, independence, and self-efficacy. Technological approaches that support older adults in leading active, healthy, and independent lives are framed within the concept of Active and Assisted Living (AAL). However, evidence regarding their impact on psychosocial well-being remains limited. Objective: This systematic review evaluates the psychosocial effects of AAL technologies in older adults. Methods: We included intervention studies reporting psychosocial outcomes related to older adults’ use of AAL technologies. We excluded studies involving participants receiving continuous on-site healthcare assistance or with moderate to severe mental health problems, technologies restricted to basic home automation or lacking advanced data processing and automation, and interventions focused on rehabilitation after acute events. Studies using not-validated measures or without quantitative evaluation of outcomes were also excluded. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, IEEE Xplore, APA PsycArticles, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to January 2025. Key attributes of eligible publications were critically discussed using a 2 × 2 logic which frames findings by both technological performance and psychosocial outcome. Results: Of 6,349 records identified, 15 independent studies were included. AAL solutions targeted promotion or guidance of physical activity, self-management of chronic conditions, fostering healthy and safe habits or distraction from pain. Twelve studies assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and close concepts. Depression was the second most investigated outcome, followed by fear of falling, with QoL and loneliness also reported. Conclusion: This review offers a critical analysis of both the findings and the methodologies employed in the selected studies, acknowledging the complexity of drawing unequivocally positive or negative conclusions regarding the impact of AAL technologies on the psychosocial well-being of older adults. The results highlight the need for a shared conceptual framework to inform the design, assessment, and validation of technologies intended to support daily living.

Effect of Active and Assisted Living technologies on psychosocial well-being in older adults: systematic review

Carlo Giacomo Leo
Co-primo
;
Antonella Bodini
Co-primo
;
Maria Rosaria Tumolo
;
Saverio Sabina;Andrea Brancaccio;Virginia Recchia;Pierpaolo Mincarone
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Background: In a rapidly aging society, the concept of psychosocial well-being becomes increasingly relevant, independent of health. Indeed, psychosocial well-being is closely related to autonomy, independence, and self-efficacy. Technological approaches that support older adults in leading active, healthy, and independent lives are framed within the concept of Active and Assisted Living (AAL). However, evidence regarding their impact on psychosocial well-being remains limited. Objective: This systematic review evaluates the psychosocial effects of AAL technologies in older adults. Methods: We included intervention studies reporting psychosocial outcomes related to older adults’ use of AAL technologies. We excluded studies involving participants receiving continuous on-site healthcare assistance or with moderate to severe mental health problems, technologies restricted to basic home automation or lacking advanced data processing and automation, and interventions focused on rehabilitation after acute events. Studies using not-validated measures or without quantitative evaluation of outcomes were also excluded. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, IEEE Xplore, APA PsycArticles, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to January 2025. Key attributes of eligible publications were critically discussed using a 2 × 2 logic which frames findings by both technological performance and psychosocial outcome. Results: Of 6,349 records identified, 15 independent studies were included. AAL solutions targeted promotion or guidance of physical activity, self-management of chronic conditions, fostering healthy and safe habits or distraction from pain. Twelve studies assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and close concepts. Depression was the second most investigated outcome, followed by fear of falling, with QoL and loneliness also reported. Conclusion: This review offers a critical analysis of both the findings and the methodologies employed in the selected studies, acknowledging the complexity of drawing unequivocally positive or negative conclusions regarding the impact of AAL technologies on the psychosocial well-being of older adults. The results highlight the need for a shared conceptual framework to inform the design, assessment, and validation of technologies intended to support daily living.
2026
Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali - IRPPS
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC - Sede Secondaria di Lecce
Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche - IMATI - Sede Secondaria Milano
Active and Assisted Living (AAL)
health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
older adults
psychosocial outcomes
psychosocial well-being
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Leo-2026-AAL.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 933.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
933.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Leo-2026-AAL-Supplementary file 1.docx

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Supplementary Material
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 29.88 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
29.88 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri
Leo-2026-AAL-Supplementary Table 1.xlsx

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Supplementary Material - Table 1
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 52.91 kB
Formato Microsoft Excel XML
52.91 kB Microsoft Excel XML Visualizza/Apri
Leo-2026-AAL-Supplementary Table 2.docx

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Supplementary Material - Table 2
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 41.9 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
41.9 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/565822
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact