Digital innovation in agriculture often struggles to meet real operational needs due to limited stakeholder involvement and insufficient assessment of context-specific costs and benefits. To bridge this gap this paper introduces AGILE- CBA, a methodological framework that (a) integrates co-design practices, (b) is structured through a Scrum Agile development process, and (c) includes a participatory cost-benefit evaluation. The framework organises co-design into a seven-step iterative cycle, embedding a five-step participatory assessment loop within each sprint. This dual structure enables the continuous and situated evaluation of both expected and observed costs and benefits, encompassing tangible and intangible aspects. By aligning key Scrum practices, such as backlog management, sprint reviews and retrospectives, with facilitated dialogue and collective reflection, AGILE-CBA can support more informed prioritisation, enhances context relevance, and reduces adoption risks. Facilitators play a crucial role in mediating communication and adjusting the pace and content of participatory activities to seasonal workloads and user capabilities. The approach is particularly suited to farming systems characterised by variability, environmental and seasonal dependency, and multi-actor complexity, offering a flexible and replicable pathway toward more inclusive, context-aware, and sustainable digital agriculture.

A framework integrating agile software development principles for co-design and participatory cost-benefit evaluation in digital agriculture

Mannari C.;Ferrari A.;Bacco M.;
2025

Abstract

Digital innovation in agriculture often struggles to meet real operational needs due to limited stakeholder involvement and insufficient assessment of context-specific costs and benefits. To bridge this gap this paper introduces AGILE- CBA, a methodological framework that (a) integrates co-design practices, (b) is structured through a Scrum Agile development process, and (c) includes a participatory cost-benefit evaluation. The framework organises co-design into a seven-step iterative cycle, embedding a five-step participatory assessment loop within each sprint. This dual structure enables the continuous and situated evaluation of both expected and observed costs and benefits, encompassing tangible and intangible aspects. By aligning key Scrum practices, such as backlog management, sprint reviews and retrospectives, with facilitated dialogue and collective reflection, AGILE-CBA can support more informed prioritisation, enhances context relevance, and reduces adoption risks. Facilitators play a crucial role in mediating communication and adjusting the pace and content of participatory activities to seasonal workloads and user capabilities. The approach is particularly suited to farming systems characterised by variability, environmental and seasonal dependency, and multi-actor complexity, offering a flexible and replicable pathway toward more inclusive, context-aware, and sustainable digital agriculture.
2025
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" - ISTI
Digital agriculture; Agile software development; Scrum; Technology co-design; Participatory evaluation; Cost-benefit analysis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025355451.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: A Framework Integrating Agile Software Development Principles for Co-Design and Participatory Cost-Benefit Evaluation in Digital Agriculture
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 487.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
487.66 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/568222
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact