Previous work has investigated the adequacy of LLMs to detect inconsistencies in requirements documents, but has also shown their limitations with real case studies. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach, which exploits traditional clustering techniques to help LLMs focus on potential inconsistencies. The approach was evaluated using a large security requirements document from the RE Open Data Initiative, with injected inconsistencies. Results show that combining LLM-based detection with rule-based clustering enhances both precision and recall.
Combining established and emerging techniques to detect inconsistencies in requirements
Fantechi A.;Gnesi S.;
2025
Abstract
Previous work has investigated the adequacy of LLMs to detect inconsistencies in requirements documents, but has also shown their limitations with real case studies. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach, which exploits traditional clustering techniques to help LLMs focus on potential inconsistencies. The approach was evaluated using a large security requirements document from the RE Open Data Initiative, with injected inconsistencies. Results show that combining LLM-based detection with rule-based clustering enhances both precision and recall.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Combining_Established_and_Emerging_Techniques_to_Detect_Inconsistencies_in_Requirements.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Combining established and emerging techniques to detect inconsistencies in requirements
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
290.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
290.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


