Validated instruments assessing gender stereotype endorsement among adolescents are scarce and often overlook contemporary domains like digital privacy. To address this gap, this study developed and validated the Gender Stereotypes and Roles Adherence Battery for Adolescents (GAB-A) in a sample of 2955 Italian adolescents attending public secondary schools in Rome (56.4% male; mean age 14.3 years). The battery comprises three modules: the Gender Stereotyped Attitude Scale (GSAS), Gender Role Activities Scale (GRAS), and Gendered Traits Inventory (GTI). Psychometric analysis confirmed robust factor structures, notably identifying a distinct “Relational Control” factor within the GSAS that assesses beliefs normalizing partner surveillance. The results revealed a stark pattern of gender differentiation: males endorsed prescriptive attitudes (GSAS, d = 1.07) and roles (GRAS, d = 0.88) substantially more than females, particularly regarding violence myths. Conversely, essentialist trait beliefs (GTI) showed negligible gender differences (d = 0.11). Associations between stereotypes and psychological health were gender-moderated; within-group analyses indicated that endorsement predicted higher distress, hostility, and alexithymia in males, while being unrelated to well-being in females. Finally, gender-stratified normative data and operational cut-offs were established. The GAB-A provides a psychometrically sound tool for identifying elevated endorsement profiles and evaluating violence prevention interventions.

The GAB-A: Development and Validation of the Gender Stereotypes and Roles Adherence Battery for Adolescents

Antonio Tintori
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Giulia Ciancimino
Secondo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
David Vagni
Penultimo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Loredana Cerbara
Ultimo
Supervision
2026

Abstract

Validated instruments assessing gender stereotype endorsement among adolescents are scarce and often overlook contemporary domains like digital privacy. To address this gap, this study developed and validated the Gender Stereotypes and Roles Adherence Battery for Adolescents (GAB-A) in a sample of 2955 Italian adolescents attending public secondary schools in Rome (56.4% male; mean age 14.3 years). The battery comprises three modules: the Gender Stereotyped Attitude Scale (GSAS), Gender Role Activities Scale (GRAS), and Gendered Traits Inventory (GTI). Psychometric analysis confirmed robust factor structures, notably identifying a distinct “Relational Control” factor within the GSAS that assesses beliefs normalizing partner surveillance. The results revealed a stark pattern of gender differentiation: males endorsed prescriptive attitudes (GSAS, d = 1.07) and roles (GRAS, d = 0.88) substantially more than females, particularly regarding violence myths. Conversely, essentialist trait beliefs (GTI) showed negligible gender differences (d = 0.11). Associations between stereotypes and psychological health were gender-moderated; within-group analyses indicated that endorsement predicted higher distress, hostility, and alexithymia in males, while being unrelated to well-being in females. Finally, gender-stratified normative data and operational cut-offs were established. The GAB-A provides a psychometrically sound tool for identifying elevated endorsement profiles and evaluating violence prevention interventions.
2026
Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali - IRPPS
Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica -IRIB
gender stereotypes, gender roles, adolescents, scale development, validation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
behavsci-16-00413-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 1.7 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.7 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/572365
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact