Pharmaceutical compounds (PCs) are one of the main classes of emerging contaminants, raising concern for their potential threat to the environment. Among them, acyclovir (ACV), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), and propranolol (PRP) are the most prescribed worldwide. However, their effects on the marine environment are still little known. In this study we assessed the ecotoxicological effects of these PCs in marine phyto- and zooplankton. In particular, growth and chlorophyll inhibition, mortality, development and behaviour were assessed in several species (Dunaliella tertiolecta, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Skeletonema pseudocostatum, Amphibalanus amphitrite, Paracentrotus lividus) after up to 72 h of exposure. Only high concentrations of any of the four PCs induced toxic effects at environmental levels. PRP was the most toxic PC towards both phyto- and zooplankton, followed by DCF, ACV, and CBZ. Environmental risk for all PCs could be estimated based on ecotoxicological responses, ranging from medium for ACV and CBZ, to high for DCF and PRP. In conclusion, all selected PCs may pose risk to marine phyto- and zooplankton. Hence, their presence and levels in the marine ecosystem should be further monitored.

Pharmaceutical compounds in marine ecosystems: ecotoxicological effects and risk assessment in phytoplankton and zooplankton

Nugnes R.
;
Gambardella C.;Miroglio R.;Zanetti Lisa;Faimali M.;Garaventa F.
2025

Abstract

Pharmaceutical compounds (PCs) are one of the main classes of emerging contaminants, raising concern for their potential threat to the environment. Among them, acyclovir (ACV), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), and propranolol (PRP) are the most prescribed worldwide. However, their effects on the marine environment are still little known. In this study we assessed the ecotoxicological effects of these PCs in marine phyto- and zooplankton. In particular, growth and chlorophyll inhibition, mortality, development and behaviour were assessed in several species (Dunaliella tertiolecta, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Skeletonema pseudocostatum, Amphibalanus amphitrite, Paracentrotus lividus) after up to 72 h of exposure. Only high concentrations of any of the four PCs induced toxic effects at environmental levels. PRP was the most toxic PC towards both phyto- and zooplankton, followed by DCF, ACV, and CBZ. Environmental risk for all PCs could be estimated based on ecotoxicological responses, ranging from medium for ACV and CBZ, to high for DCF and PRP. In conclusion, all selected PCs may pose risk to marine phyto- and zooplankton. Hence, their presence and levels in the marine ecosystem should be further monitored.
2025
Istituto per lo studio degli impatti Antropici e Sostenibilità in ambiente marino - IAS - Genova
Algae
Crustacean
Ecotoxicity
Marine pollution
Risk assessment
Sea urchin
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Nugnes et al. 2025 Ecotoxicology.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.63 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/575021
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact