Understanding temperature variations within the complex urban canopy layer (UCL) is challenging due to limitations and discrepancies between temperature measurements taken in urban canyons and on rooftops. The key question is how much these measurements differ and what factors contribute to these differences. According to the guidance by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), rooftop observations are not encouraged for urban monitoring, due to potentially anomalous microclimatic conditions, whereas measurements within urban canyons are recommended. This is particularly relevant given the increasing number of rooftop sensors deployed through citizen science, raising questions about the representativeness of such data. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap by comparing temperatures within the UCL using two sensors: one located on a rooftop, and the other positioned within the canyon. The temperature difference between these two nearby locations followed a clear diurnal cycle, peaking at over 1 °C between 12:00 and 16:00 local time, with the canyon warmer than the rooftop. This daytime warming was primarily driven by solar radiation and, to a lesser extent, by wind speed, but only under clear-sky conditions. During the rest of the day, the temperature difference remained negligible.

Temperature Differences Between Rooftop and Urban Canyon Sensors: Diurnal Dynamics, Drivers, and Implications

Marinelli, Lorenzo;Cecilia, Andrea
;
Casasanta, Giampietro;Conidi, Alessandro;Petenko, Igor;Argentini, Stefania
2025

Abstract

Understanding temperature variations within the complex urban canopy layer (UCL) is challenging due to limitations and discrepancies between temperature measurements taken in urban canyons and on rooftops. The key question is how much these measurements differ and what factors contribute to these differences. According to the guidance by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), rooftop observations are not encouraged for urban monitoring, due to potentially anomalous microclimatic conditions, whereas measurements within urban canyons are recommended. This is particularly relevant given the increasing number of rooftop sensors deployed through citizen science, raising questions about the representativeness of such data. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap by comparing temperatures within the UCL using two sensors: one located on a rooftop, and the other positioned within the canyon. The temperature difference between these two nearby locations followed a clear diurnal cycle, peaking at over 1 °C between 12:00 and 16:00 local time, with the canyon warmer than the rooftop. This daytime warming was primarily driven by solar radiation and, to a lesser extent, by wind speed, but only under clear-sky conditions. During the rest of the day, the temperature difference remained negligible.
2025
Istituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima - ISAC - Sede Secondaria Roma
WMO compliancy
rooftop measurements
sensor siting
urban canyon
urban temperature
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/582483
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ente

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact