Objective This work aimed to identify effective items to be considered throughout the lifecycle of research projects developing medical devices, in accordance with MDR EU 2017/745, to support adoption in practice of the resulting innovation. Methods A modified Delphi method was designed by a team of facilitators to collect/analyze suggestions from a selected panel of Italian experts with experience in medical device regulation and development. The team developed a questionnaire consisting of 46 questions organized according to key phases of a research project lifecycle: concept phase, research project design and plan, project execution and device development, project monitoring and control, and project closure. Results Twenty expert contributions were collected and harmonized. Thirty-three expert-derived statements were compiled, providing an overview of essential regulatory aspects to consider throughout the lifecycle of a medical device research project within Public Research Institutions. Conclusions This work may inspire effective practices and procedures to support a regulation-based approach for developing innovative medical devices in Public Research Institutions.
A regulation-based project lifecycle for innovative medical devices: Delphi consensus from an Italian expert panel
Maria Raffaella Martina;Francesca Rossi;Elisabetta Bianchini;Enrico Gianluca Caiani;Nicole Di Lascio;Martina Francesconi;Vincenzo Gemignani;Gianluca Sferrazza;
2026
Abstract
Objective This work aimed to identify effective items to be considered throughout the lifecycle of research projects developing medical devices, in accordance with MDR EU 2017/745, to support adoption in practice of the resulting innovation. Methods A modified Delphi method was designed by a team of facilitators to collect/analyze suggestions from a selected panel of Italian experts with experience in medical device regulation and development. The team developed a questionnaire consisting of 46 questions organized according to key phases of a research project lifecycle: concept phase, research project design and plan, project execution and device development, project monitoring and control, and project closure. Results Twenty expert contributions were collected and harmonized. Thirty-three expert-derived statements were compiled, providing an overview of essential regulatory aspects to consider throughout the lifecycle of a medical device research project within Public Research Institutions. Conclusions This work may inspire effective practices and procedures to support a regulation-based approach for developing innovative medical devices in Public Research Institutions.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


