In this paper we will examine two main aspects of trust dynamics: a) How direct experiences involving trust, with their successes or failures, influence the future trust of an agent about similar facts. We challenge the trivial idea that always success increases trust while failure decreases it. Of course, this primitive view cannot be avoided till Trust is modeled just as a simple index, a dimension, a number; for example reduced to mere subjective probability. We claim that a cognitive attribution process is needed in order to update trust on the basis of an 'interpretation' of the outcome of A's reliance on B and of B' s performance (failure or success). b) How the fact that A trusts B and relies on it in situation ? can actually (objectively) influence B's trustworthiness in the ? situation. Either trust is a self- fulfilling prophecy that modifies the subjective probability of the predicted event; or it is a self-defeating strategy by negatively influencing the events. These phenomena are very crucial in human societies (states, market, groups), but also in computer mediated Organizations, Interactions (EC), Cooperation (CSCW) and even in Multi-Agent Systems with autonomous agents. We present a formal model of these dynamic non- trivial aspects.

Trust Dynamics: How Trust is influenced by direct experiences and by Trust itself

Falcone R;Castelfranchi;
2004

Abstract

In this paper we will examine two main aspects of trust dynamics: a) How direct experiences involving trust, with their successes or failures, influence the future trust of an agent about similar facts. We challenge the trivial idea that always success increases trust while failure decreases it. Of course, this primitive view cannot be avoided till Trust is modeled just as a simple index, a dimension, a number; for example reduced to mere subjective probability. We claim that a cognitive attribution process is needed in order to update trust on the basis of an 'interpretation' of the outcome of A's reliance on B and of B' s performance (failure or success). b) How the fact that A trusts B and relies on it in situation ? can actually (objectively) influence B's trustworthiness in the ? situation. Either trust is a self- fulfilling prophecy that modifies the subjective probability of the predicted event; or it is a self-defeating strategy by negatively influencing the events. These phenomena are very crucial in human societies (states, market, groups), but also in computer mediated Organizations, Interactions (EC), Cooperation (CSCW) and even in Multi-Agent Systems with autonomous agents. We present a formal model of these dynamic non- trivial aspects.
2004
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione - ISTC
Inglese
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-04)
3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-04)
740
747
8
1-58113-864-4
IEEE Computer Society
Los Alamitos [CA]
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
July 19-23
New York
trust
dynamics
anticipation
mental ingredients
1
none
Falcone R.; Castelfranchi; C.
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/58694
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact