Transformer language models embed tokens in high-dimensional spaces, but whether geometry reflects linguistic structure remains unclear. We analyse token representations in BERT and GPT-2, selected as canonical encoder-only and decoder-only Transformer architectures, through a linguistically-grounded geometric lens. We partition tokens from the Universal Dependencies English Web treebank by surface and syntactic features (position, length, POS, head distance and arity) and examine how their representational geometry evolves across layers. We employ complementary diagnostic metrics, including isotropy, linear and nonlinear intrinsic dimensionality, to capture distinct aspects of embedding structure. Our findings reveal that BERT maintains more isotropic and higher-dimensional subspaces, whereas GPT-2 exhibits stronger anisotropy driven by a compact cluster of sentence-initial tokens. Across models, open-class words, longer tokens, and predicates with several dependents occupy more isotropic, higher-dimensional manifolds than short function words and pre-head modifiers, indicating that semantic richness and syntactic centrality play a key role in structuring embedding space. Our analysis provides a reusable framework for profiling how linguistic abstractions organize the geometry of Transformer embeddings.
Linguistic Profiling of Transformer Embedding Geometry
Lucia Domenichelli;Dominique Brunato;Felice Dell'Orletta
2026
Abstract
Transformer language models embed tokens in high-dimensional spaces, but whether geometry reflects linguistic structure remains unclear. We analyse token representations in BERT and GPT-2, selected as canonical encoder-only and decoder-only Transformer architectures, through a linguistically-grounded geometric lens. We partition tokens from the Universal Dependencies English Web treebank by surface and syntactic features (position, length, POS, head distance and arity) and examine how their representational geometry evolves across layers. We employ complementary diagnostic metrics, including isotropy, linear and nonlinear intrinsic dimensionality, to capture distinct aspects of embedding structure. Our findings reveal that BERT maintains more isotropic and higher-dimensional subspaces, whereas GPT-2 exhibits stronger anisotropy driven by a compact cluster of sentence-initial tokens. Across models, open-class words, longer tokens, and predicates with several dependents occupy more isotropic, higher-dimensional manifolds than short function words and pre-head modifiers, indicating that semantic richness and syntactic centrality play a key role in structuring embedding space. Our analysis provides a reusable framework for profiling how linguistic abstractions organize the geometry of Transformer embeddings.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2026.conll-main.10.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: pdf dell'articolo pubblicato
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


