Electrochemical reforming of biomass-derived oxygenates offers an industrially viable route to co-produce high-added-value chemicals and green hydrogen at lower voltages than conventional water electrolysis. Over the past five years, more than 200 studies have demonstrated rapid advances, with both proton exchange membrane (PEM) and anion exchange membrane (AEM) systems achieving industrially relevant current densities (1 A cm-2) at cell voltages even below 1 V. However, the electrolyte pH has a profound influence on the process through reaction pathways, catalyst and membrane stability, and even on overall reaction stoichiometry. In this opinion, we provide a critical comparison of the often-overlooked differences between acidic and alkaline technologies, highlighting their distinct thermodynamic, kinetic, mass-balance, and energetics trade-offs, to define the research priorities in the path toward the scale-up and deployment of high added value chemicals.
Comparative Assessment of Alkaline and Acidic Electrochemical Reforming of Bio-ethanol for Hydrogen and Value-Added Chemicals Production
Perissi, Ilaria;Bellini, Marco;Berretti, Enrico;Pagliaro, Maria Vincenza;Lavacchi, A.
2026
Abstract
Electrochemical reforming of biomass-derived oxygenates offers an industrially viable route to co-produce high-added-value chemicals and green hydrogen at lower voltages than conventional water electrolysis. Over the past five years, more than 200 studies have demonstrated rapid advances, with both proton exchange membrane (PEM) and anion exchange membrane (AEM) systems achieving industrially relevant current densities (1 A cm-2) at cell voltages even below 1 V. However, the electrolyte pH has a profound influence on the process through reaction pathways, catalyst and membrane stability, and even on overall reaction stoichiometry. In this opinion, we provide a critical comparison of the often-overlooked differences between acidic and alkaline technologies, highlighting their distinct thermodynamic, kinetic, mass-balance, and energetics trade-offs, to define the research priorities in the path toward the scale-up and deployment of high added value chemicals.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S2451910326001274-main.pdf
embargo fino al 03/09/2028
Descrizione: This is the accepted manuscript version of an article that is published at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2026.101936
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
8.75 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.75 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


