The traditional Italian approach to seismic risk management has focused more on postdisaster recovery than proactive urban prevention policies. This has resulted in significant costs and has profoundly affected local communities and urban functionality. This paper aims to contribute to the debate on seismic prevention strategies by introducing a new planning tool for early recovery − the Early Recovery System (ERS) − along with a methodology for assessing its impact on post-earthquake urban functionality.
Why Should We Bother About Risk Reduction at the Urban Scale?The Early Recovery System (Ers) Framework to Assess the Impact of Prevention Instruments on Post-Quake Urban Functionality
Cora Fontana
Primo
Conceptualization
;Valentina TomassoniSecondo
Conceptualization
;Margherita Giuffre'Penultimo
Conceptualization
;Massimiliano MoscatelliUltimo
Conceptualization
2024
Abstract
The traditional Italian approach to seismic risk management has focused more on postdisaster recovery than proactive urban prevention policies. This has resulted in significant costs and has profoundly affected local communities and urban functionality. This paper aims to contribute to the debate on seismic prevention strategies by introducing a new planning tool for early recovery − the Early Recovery System (ERS) − along with a methodology for assessing its impact on post-earthquake urban functionality.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


