Rationale Clinical probability assessment is a fundamental step in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Objective To develop a predictive model for pulmonary embolism based on clinical symptoms, signs, and the interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Methods The model was developed from a database of 1100 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism of whom 440 had the disease confirmed by angiography or autopsy findings. It was validated in an independent sample of 400 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (71% inpatients). Easy-to-use software was developed for computing the clinical probability on palm computers and mobile phones. Results The model comprises 16 variables of which 10 (older age, male gender, prolonged immobilization, history of deep vein thrombosis, sudden onset dyspnea, chest pain, syncope, hemoptysis, unilateral leg swelling, electrocardiographic signs of acute cor pulmonale) are positively associated, and 6 (prior cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, orthopnea, high fever, wheezes or crackles on chest auscultation) are negatively associated with pulmonary embolism. In the validation sample, 165 (41%) of 400 patients had pulmonary embolism confirmed by angiography. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 2% when the predicted clinical probability was slight (0 to 10%), 28% when moderate (11 to 50%), 67% when substantial (51 to 80%), and 94% when high (81 to 100%). There was no significant difference between inpatients and outpatients with respect to the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in the four probability categories. Conclusions The proposed model is simple and accurate, and it may aid physicians when assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Simple and accurate prediction of the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism

Miniati M;Monti S;Serasini L;Passera M
2008

Abstract

Rationale Clinical probability assessment is a fundamental step in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Objective To develop a predictive model for pulmonary embolism based on clinical symptoms, signs, and the interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Methods The model was developed from a database of 1100 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism of whom 440 had the disease confirmed by angiography or autopsy findings. It was validated in an independent sample of 400 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (71% inpatients). Easy-to-use software was developed for computing the clinical probability on palm computers and mobile phones. Results The model comprises 16 variables of which 10 (older age, male gender, prolonged immobilization, history of deep vein thrombosis, sudden onset dyspnea, chest pain, syncope, hemoptysis, unilateral leg swelling, electrocardiographic signs of acute cor pulmonale) are positively associated, and 6 (prior cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, orthopnea, high fever, wheezes or crackles on chest auscultation) are negatively associated with pulmonary embolism. In the validation sample, 165 (41%) of 400 patients had pulmonary embolism confirmed by angiography. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 2% when the predicted clinical probability was slight (0 to 10%), 28% when moderate (11 to 50%), 67% when substantial (51 to 80%), and 94% when high (81 to 100%). There was no significant difference between inpatients and outpatients with respect to the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in the four probability categories. Conclusions The proposed model is simple and accurate, and it may aid physicians when assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
2008
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
pulmonary embolism; diagnosis; clinical assessment
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_62796-doc_20416.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: articolo pubblicato
Dimensione 215.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
215.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/74358
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact