This report describes a proband and his family consisting of 14 patients affected with simple congenital ptosis. Pedigree suggests an autosomal dominant pattern with 70-90% penetrance. The family includes patients with both unilateral and bilateral involvement, and cases with and/or without complex synkinesia. Left unilateral preponderance is striking, and pedigree analysis suggests the possibility of a modifier gene determining laterality. This study represents the first report of a large family with congenital autosomal dominant simple ptosis which demonstrates the full clinical spectrum of this condition. (c) 2005 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Clinical heterogeneity in familial congenital ptosis: analysis of fourteen cases in one family over five generations

Parano E;
2005

Abstract

This report describes a proband and his family consisting of 14 patients affected with simple congenital ptosis. Pedigree suggests an autosomal dominant pattern with 70-90% penetrance. The family includes patients with both unilateral and bilateral involvement, and cases with and/or without complex synkinesia. Left unilateral preponderance is striking, and pedigree analysis suggests the possibility of a modifier gene determining laterality. This study represents the first report of a large family with congenital autosomal dominant simple ptosis which demonstrates the full clinical spectrum of this condition. (c) 2005 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2005
Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche - ISN - Sede Mangone
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_49960-doc_31513.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Clinical heterogeneity in familial congenital ptosis: analysis of fourteen cases in one family over five generations
Dimensione 233.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
233.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/76622
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact