Many 3D scanning systems and software tools are currently available, but a comparative study of their actual precision and robustness still lacks. To this end, this paper presents a comparison of such systems, taking into consideration three alignment tools and two merging tools for the management of scanned data. The comparison will be based on the scanning and reconstruction of two relatively complex artistic sculptures and a number of 'ground truth' objects. The quality of the reconstructed 3D models is evaluated using both qualitative and quantitative measures. Quantitative evaluation is performed using Metro, a tool for computing differences between 3D meshes.
A comparison of systems and tools for 3D scanning
Cignoni P;
2005
Abstract
Many 3D scanning systems and software tools are currently available, but a comparative study of their actual precision and robustness still lacks. To this end, this paper presents a comparison of such systems, taking into consideration three alignment tools and two merging tools for the management of scanned data. The comparison will be based on the scanning and reconstruction of two relatively complex artistic sculptures and a number of 'ground truth' objects. The quality of the reconstructed 3D models is evaluated using both qualitative and quantitative measures. Quantitative evaluation is performed using Metro, a tool for computing differences between 3D meshes.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
prod_120528-doc_127999.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: A comparison of systems and tools for 3D scanning
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Dimensione
1.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
