Background. Two direct measurements of peripheral insulin sensitivity are the M value derived from the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp (EC) and the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration derived from the insulin suppression test (IST). Prior work suggests that these measures are highly correlated, but the agreement between them is unknown. To determine the agreement between SSPG andM and to develop transformation equations to convert SSPG to M and vice versa, we directly compared these two measurements in the same individuals. Methods. A total of 15 nondiabetic subjects (9 women and 6 men) underwent both an EC and a modified version of the IST within a median interval of 5 days. We performed standard correlation metrics of the two measures and developed transformation regression equations for the two measures. Results. The mean±SD age of the subjects was 57±7 years and body mass index, 27.7± 3.9 kg/m2. The median (interquartile range) SSPG concentration was 6.7 (5.1, 9.8) mmol/L and M value, 49.6 (28.9, 64.2) ?mol/min/kg-LBM. There was a highly significant correlation between SSPG and M (r=-0.87, P <0.001). The relationship was best fit by regression models with exponential/logarithmic functions (R2=0.85). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated an excellent agreement between these measures of insulin action. Conclusion. The SSPG and M are highly related measures of insulin sensitivity and the results provide the means to directly compare the two measurements.

Measurement of insulin-mediated glucose uptake: Direct comparison of the modified insulin suppression test and the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp

Mari A;
2013

Abstract

Background. Two direct measurements of peripheral insulin sensitivity are the M value derived from the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp (EC) and the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration derived from the insulin suppression test (IST). Prior work suggests that these measures are highly correlated, but the agreement between them is unknown. To determine the agreement between SSPG andM and to develop transformation equations to convert SSPG to M and vice versa, we directly compared these two measurements in the same individuals. Methods. A total of 15 nondiabetic subjects (9 women and 6 men) underwent both an EC and a modified version of the IST within a median interval of 5 days. We performed standard correlation metrics of the two measures and developed transformation regression equations for the two measures. Results. The mean±SD age of the subjects was 57±7 years and body mass index, 27.7± 3.9 kg/m2. The median (interquartile range) SSPG concentration was 6.7 (5.1, 9.8) mmol/L and M value, 49.6 (28.9, 64.2) ?mol/min/kg-LBM. There was a highly significant correlation between SSPG and M (r=-0.87, P <0.001). The relationship was best fit by regression models with exponential/logarithmic functions (R2=0.85). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated an excellent agreement between these measures of insulin action. Conclusion. The SSPG and M are highly related measures of insulin sensitivity and the results provide the means to directly compare the two measurements.
2013
INGEGNERIA BIOMEDICA
Istituto di Neuroscienze - IN -
Insulin resistance
Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp
Insulin suppression test
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/140772
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact