Quality assessment of pansharpened images is traditionally carried out either at degraded spatial scale by checking the synthesis property ofWald's protocol or at the full spatial scale by separately checking the spectral and spatial consistencies. The spatial distortion of the QNR protocol and the spectral distortion of Khan's protocol may be combined into a unique quality index, referred to as hybrid QNR (HQNR), that is calculated at full scale. Alternatively, multiscale measurements of indices requiring a reference, like SAM, ERGAS and Q4, may be extrapolated to yield a quality measurement at the full scale of the fusion product, where a reference does not exist. Experiments on simulated Pl´eiades data, of which reference originals at full scale are available, highlight that quadratic polynomials having three-point support, i.e. fitting three measurements at as many progressively doubled scales, are adequate. Q4 is more suitable for extrapolation than ERGAS and SAM. The Q4 value predicted from multiscale measurements and the Q4 value measured at full scale thanks to the reference original, differ by very few percents for six different state-of-the-art methods that have been compared. HQNR is substantially comparable to the extrapolated Q4.

Full scale assessment of pansharpening methods and data products

Bruno Aiazzi;Luciano Alparone;Stefano Baronti;Andrea Garzelli;Leonardo Santurri
2014

Abstract

Quality assessment of pansharpened images is traditionally carried out either at degraded spatial scale by checking the synthesis property ofWald's protocol or at the full spatial scale by separately checking the spectral and spatial consistencies. The spatial distortion of the QNR protocol and the spectral distortion of Khan's protocol may be combined into a unique quality index, referred to as hybrid QNR (HQNR), that is calculated at full scale. Alternatively, multiscale measurements of indices requiring a reference, like SAM, ERGAS and Q4, may be extrapolated to yield a quality measurement at the full scale of the fusion product, where a reference does not exist. Experiments on simulated Pl´eiades data, of which reference originals at full scale are available, highlight that quadratic polynomials having three-point support, i.e. fitting three measurements at as many progressively doubled scales, are adequate. Q4 is more suitable for extrapolation than ERGAS and SAM. The Q4 value predicted from multiscale measurements and the Q4 value measured at full scale thanks to the reference original, differ by very few percents for six different state-of-the-art methods that have been compared. HQNR is substantially comparable to the extrapolated Q4.
2014
Istituto di Fisica Applicata - IFAC
Inglese
L. Bruzzone, J. A. Benediktsson, F. Bovolo
Proceedings of SPIE Remote Sensing 2014: Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XX
SPIE Remote Sensing 2014: Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XX
9244
1
12
12
978-1-6284-1307-6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2067770
SPIE, The International Society for Optical Engineering
BELLINGHAM
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
22-25 Sep. 2014
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Pansharpening
quality assessment
remote sensing
spatial and spectral consistency
statistical similarity indices
6
none
Aiazzi, Bruno; Alparone, Luciano; Baronti, Stefano; Carlà, Roberto; Garzelli, Andrea; Santurri, Leonardo
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/263560
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 101
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 85
social impact