Numerousness of formats characterizes the state of the art in biodiversity data management. If compared to other research field, there is a lack in harmonization and standardization of these data. If on the one hand data from traditional biodiversity collections (from museums, national parks, etc.) can be easily represented by existing de-facto standard, on the other hand the growing number of field observation, for instance by VGI activities (e.g. iNaturalist [1]) or from automated systems (e.g. animal biotelemetry), would at least require upgrades of the currently used formats. Moreover, in an eco-informatics perspective, the usage of data from different scientific fields is to be expected (abiotic data, geographic information, etc.) and the possibility to represent this information and biodiversity data in a homogeneous way could be an advantage for interoperability. We will discuss the opportunity of exploitation of the standard for observation data by Open Geospatial Consortium, namely Observation and Measurements (O&M) [2], a model developed for sensor data but with strong analogies with the biodiversity-oriented OBOE ontology [3]. The applicability of OGC O&M has been yet suggested by INSPIRE Cross Thematic Working Group on Observations & Measurements [4] and New Zealand Environmental Information Interoperability Framework [5]. In our opinion, could be an advantage for the biodiversity community. We will propose some example and the advatages offered by O&M with respect to other representation format.

On the opportunity of exploiting open Geospatial standard for biotic data management.

A Oggioni;P Tagliolato;C Fugazza;I Rosati;L Criscuolo;P Carrara
2015

Abstract

Numerousness of formats characterizes the state of the art in biodiversity data management. If compared to other research field, there is a lack in harmonization and standardization of these data. If on the one hand data from traditional biodiversity collections (from museums, national parks, etc.) can be easily represented by existing de-facto standard, on the other hand the growing number of field observation, for instance by VGI activities (e.g. iNaturalist [1]) or from automated systems (e.g. animal biotelemetry), would at least require upgrades of the currently used formats. Moreover, in an eco-informatics perspective, the usage of data from different scientific fields is to be expected (abiotic data, geographic information, etc.) and the possibility to represent this information and biodiversity data in a homogeneous way could be an advantage for interoperability. We will discuss the opportunity of exploitation of the standard for observation data by Open Geospatial Consortium, namely Observation and Measurements (O&M) [2], a model developed for sensor data but with strong analogies with the biodiversity-oriented OBOE ontology [3]. The applicability of OGC O&M has been yet suggested by INSPIRE Cross Thematic Working Group on Observations & Measurements [4] and New Zealand Environmental Information Interoperability Framework [5]. In our opinion, could be an advantage for the biodiversity community. We will propose some example and the advatages offered by O&M with respect to other representation format.
2015
Istituto per il Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dell'Ambiente - IREA
O&M
biotic data
OGC standards
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/328942
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact