We report on the experience made with three Natural Language Processing analysis tools, aimed to compare their performance in detecting ambiguity and under-specification in requirements documents, and to compare them with respect to other qualities like learnability, usability, and efficiency. Two industrial tools, Requirements Scout and QVscribe, and an academic one, QuARS, are compared.
An experience with the application of three nlp tools for the analysis of natural language requirements
Fantechi A;Gnesi S;
2020
Abstract
We report on the experience made with three Natural Language Processing analysis tools, aimed to compare their performance in detecting ambiguity and under-specification in requirements documents, and to compare them with respect to other qualities like learnability, usability, and efficiency. Two industrial tools, Requirements Scout and QVscribe, and an academic one, QuARS, are compared.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
prod_446396-doc_160490.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: An experience with the application of three nlp tools for the analysis of natural language requirements
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione
234.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
234.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
