In Europe, bentonites are allowed as feed additives for aflatoxin mitigation (1m558) provided they have specificmineralogical characteristics and an aflatoxin-binding capacity (BCAfB1) above 90%. BCAfB1 is determined by anofficial adsorption assay using an aflatoxin solution (4 mg/L) in acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and a bentonite at 0.02%(w/v). To date, the robustness of this method has not been investigated.In this work, we addressed this challenge and performed a robustness study by analyzing six bentonite samplesthat met the mineralogical requirements for claim code 1 m558. Leading factors selected for robustness testingwere (1) preparation mode of bentonite suspension, (2) residual amount of acetonitrile in the test trial, (3) acetatebuffer concentration, (4) incubation time, and (5) centrifugation. It was statistically evinced that factors 2and 5 affected the results. Due to its weakness, the method excluded 4 out of six bentonites to be marketed in EU,being BCAfB1 < 90%. A new protocol was developed by keeping the main experimental parameters of the officialassay and was in-house validated. This protocol yielded BCAfB1 > 90% for all test bentonites and showedsatisfactory precisions with a RSDI of 3.4% and HorRat < 2. Its validity was proven by the isotherm approach,comparing Langmuir adsorption parameters with BCAfB1 values. Application of the protocol to bentonites otherthan montmorillonite was demonstrated.
Optimization and in-house validation of the analytical procedure for official control of bentonites as aflatoxin inactivators
Vito D'Ascanio;Donato Greco;Mariagrazia Abbasciano;Giuseppina Avantaggiato
2023
Abstract
In Europe, bentonites are allowed as feed additives for aflatoxin mitigation (1m558) provided they have specificmineralogical characteristics and an aflatoxin-binding capacity (BCAfB1) above 90%. BCAfB1 is determined by anofficial adsorption assay using an aflatoxin solution (4 mg/L) in acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and a bentonite at 0.02%(w/v). To date, the robustness of this method has not been investigated.In this work, we addressed this challenge and performed a robustness study by analyzing six bentonite samplesthat met the mineralogical requirements for claim code 1 m558. Leading factors selected for robustness testingwere (1) preparation mode of bentonite suspension, (2) residual amount of acetonitrile in the test trial, (3) acetatebuffer concentration, (4) incubation time, and (5) centrifugation. It was statistically evinced that factors 2and 5 affected the results. Due to its weakness, the method excluded 4 out of six bentonites to be marketed in EU,being BCAfB1 < 90%. A new protocol was developed by keeping the main experimental parameters of the officialassay and was in-house validated. This protocol yielded BCAfB1 > 90% for all test bentonites and showedsatisfactory precisions with a RSDI of 3.4% and HorRat < 2. Its validity was proven by the isotherm approach,comparing Langmuir adsorption parameters with BCAfB1 values. Application of the protocol to bentonites otherthan montmorillonite was demonstrated.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
prod_486596-doc_201917.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Optimization and in-house validation of the analytical procedure for official control of bentonites as aflatoxin inactivators
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
848.12 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
848.12 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.