Several studies have compared the performances of midbrain to pons area ratio (M/P) and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) in distinguishing patients with Progressive Supra- nuclear Palsy (PSP) from those with Parkinson's disease (PD) with con icting results. The current study aimed to compare the performance of these indexes in a well-characterized sample of PSP patients using either a manual or a fully automated approach to measure the brainstem structures involved in M/P and MRPI calculation. Methods: This study involved 179 patients affected by idiopathic PD, 35 patients affected by PSP (15 probable and 20 possible) and 87 healthy controls. Sensitivity, speci city, positive predictive value (PPV) and area under the curve (AUC) of MRPI and M/P in distinguishing possible and probable PSP from PD and controls were calculated. Results: No signi cant difference was found between manual and automated values for both MRPI and M/P. MRPI and M/P differentiated probable PSP from PD with similar performance. By contrast, MRPI showed higher sensitivity and speci city than M/P when patients with possible PSP were compared with PD (MRPI, sensitivity 100%, speci city 98.88%; M/P, sensitivity 85%, speci city 93.85%). A signi cant difference was also observed in AUC between MRPI and M/P in distinguishing possible PSP from PD. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that MRPI was more accurate than M/P, in differentiating patients with possible PSP from those with PD. In patients suspected of having PSP with a low level of clinic diagnostic accuracy, MRPI should be preferred to M/P for distinguishing these patients from PD

Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index and midbrain to pons ratio: Which index better distinguishes Progressive Supranuclear Palsy patients with a low degree of diagnostic certainty from patients with Parkinson Disease?

Salvatore Nigro;Maurizio Morelli;Gennarina Arabia;Fabiana Novellino;Maria Salsone;Federico Rocca;Aldo Quattrone
2017

Abstract

Several studies have compared the performances of midbrain to pons area ratio (M/P) and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) in distinguishing patients with Progressive Supra- nuclear Palsy (PSP) from those with Parkinson's disease (PD) with con icting results. The current study aimed to compare the performance of these indexes in a well-characterized sample of PSP patients using either a manual or a fully automated approach to measure the brainstem structures involved in M/P and MRPI calculation. Methods: This study involved 179 patients affected by idiopathic PD, 35 patients affected by PSP (15 probable and 20 possible) and 87 healthy controls. Sensitivity, speci city, positive predictive value (PPV) and area under the curve (AUC) of MRPI and M/P in distinguishing possible and probable PSP from PD and controls were calculated. Results: No signi cant difference was found between manual and automated values for both MRPI and M/P. MRPI and M/P differentiated probable PSP from PD with similar performance. By contrast, MRPI showed higher sensitivity and speci city than M/P when patients with possible PSP were compared with PD (MRPI, sensitivity 100%, speci city 98.88%; M/P, sensitivity 85%, speci city 93.85%). A signi cant difference was also observed in AUC between MRPI and M/P in distinguishing possible PSP from PD. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that MRPI was more accurate than M/P, in differentiating patients with possible PSP from those with PD. In patients suspected of having PSP with a low level of clinic diagnostic accuracy, MRPI should be preferred to M/P for distinguishing these patients from PD
2017
Istituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare - IBFM - Sede Secondaria di Germaneto (CZ)
Parkinsonism index, progressive supra nuclear palsy, Parkinson disease, MRPI, MR imaging
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/509843
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact