(Estratto) The paper by V. Kozhinov “Is structural poetics possible?” (1965) is not the first that opponents of structuralism dedicate to that question. Since the beginning of the debate, the tone and character of the charges presented to those authors that implement statistical and structural methodologies in humanistic sciences underwent a significant evolution. L. Timofeev was the first to open the discussion, introducing structuralism as suddenly revived ‘formalism’, as the repetition of an outdated stage of science.
Literary criticism must be scientific
Restaneo, Pietro
2022
Abstract
(Estratto) The paper by V. Kozhinov “Is structural poetics possible?” (1965) is not the first that opponents of structuralism dedicate to that question. Since the beginning of the debate, the tone and character of the charges presented to those authors that implement statistical and structural methodologies in humanistic sciences underwent a significant evolution. L. Timofeev was the first to open the discussion, introducing structuralism as suddenly revived ‘formalism’, as the repetition of an outdated stage of science.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
