Researchers face the challenge of defining subject selection criteria when training algorithms for human activity recognition tasks. The ongoing uncertainty revolves around which characteristics should be considered to ensure algorithmic robustness across diverse populations. This study aims to address this challenge by conducting an analysis of heterogeneity in the training data to assess the impact of physical characteristics and soft-biometric attributes on activity recognition performance. The performance of various state-of-the-art deep neural network architectures (tCNN, hybrid-LSTM, Transformer model) processing time-series data using the IntelliRehab (IRDS) dataset was evaluated. By intentionally introducing bias into the training data based on human characteristics, the objective is to identify the characteristics that influence algorithms in motion analysis. Experimental findings reveal that the CNN-LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy, reaching 88%. Moreover, models trained on heterogeneous distributions of disability attributes exhibited notably higher accuracy, reaching 51%, compared to those not considering such factors, which scored an average of 33%. These evaluations underscore the significant influence of subjects’ characteristics on activity recognition performance, providing valuable insights into the algorithm's robustness across diverse populations. This study represents a significant step forward in promoting fairness and trustworthiness in artificial intelligence by quantifying representation bias in multi-channel time-series activity recognition data within the healthcare domain.

Promoting fairness in activity recognition algorithms for patient's monitoring and evaluation systems in healthcare

Mennella C.
Primo
;
Esposito M.
Secondo
;
De Pietro G.
Penultimo
;
Maniscalco U.
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Researchers face the challenge of defining subject selection criteria when training algorithms for human activity recognition tasks. The ongoing uncertainty revolves around which characteristics should be considered to ensure algorithmic robustness across diverse populations. This study aims to address this challenge by conducting an analysis of heterogeneity in the training data to assess the impact of physical characteristics and soft-biometric attributes on activity recognition performance. The performance of various state-of-the-art deep neural network architectures (tCNN, hybrid-LSTM, Transformer model) processing time-series data using the IntelliRehab (IRDS) dataset was evaluated. By intentionally introducing bias into the training data based on human characteristics, the objective is to identify the characteristics that influence algorithms in motion analysis. Experimental findings reveal that the CNN-LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy, reaching 88%. Moreover, models trained on heterogeneous distributions of disability attributes exhibited notably higher accuracy, reaching 51%, compared to those not considering such factors, which scored an average of 33%. These evaluations underscore the significant influence of subjects’ characteristics on activity recognition performance, providing valuable insights into the algorithm's robustness across diverse populations. This study represents a significant step forward in promoting fairness and trustworthiness in artificial intelligence by quantifying representation bias in multi-channel time-series activity recognition data within the healthcare domain.
2024
Istituto di Calcolo e Reti ad Alte Prestazioni - ICAR - Sede Secondaria Napoli
Artificial intelligence
Bias
Deep learning
Motion analysis
Rehabilitation
Time-series
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0010482524009119-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 1.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.58 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/524407
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact