The issue of how to experimentally evaluate information extraction (IE) systems has received hardly any satisfactory solution in the literature. In this paper we propose a novel evaluation model for IE and argue that, among others, it allows (i) a correct appreciation of the degree of overlap between predicted and true segments, and (ii) a fair evaluation of the ability of a system to correctly identify segment boundaries. We describe the properties of this models, also by presenting the result of a re-evaluation of the results of the CoNLL'03 and CoNLL'02 Shared Tasks on Named Entity Extraction.

Evaluating information extraction

Esuli A;Sebastiani F
2010

Abstract

The issue of how to experimentally evaluate information extraction (IE) systems has received hardly any satisfactory solution in the literature. In this paper we propose a novel evaluation model for IE and argue that, among others, it allows (i) a correct appreciation of the degree of overlap between predicted and true segments, and (ii) a fair evaluation of the ability of a system to correctly identify segment boundaries. We describe the properties of this models, also by presenting the result of a re-evaluation of the results of the CoNLL'03 and CoNLL'02 Shared Tasks on Named Entity Extraction.
2010
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" - ISTI
978-3-642-15997-8
Information Search and Retrieval
Natural Language Processing
Experimental evaluation
Information Extraction
Wrapper induction
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_44397-doc_84549.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Evaluating information extraction
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 173.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
173.05 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/52927
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact