This study presents a narrative review of scholarly literature at the intersection of education, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and automated assessment algorithms. Acknowledging the pressing need for a unified regulatory framework to enable the safe deployment of AI-based assessment technologies in educational environments, the paper investigates whether a coherent and consistent terminology is employed across academic research. It further compiles and systematizes the ethical and legal principles underpinning the use of such systems, from the Ethical "AI explainability" to the emergent "Right to Explanation" introduced by Article 22 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The review finds that key concepts such as "assessment" and "explainability" are currently used with divergent meanings across disciplines. The analysis identifies transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and non-discrimination as the core principles most frequently emphasized in the literature, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary convergence to ensure trustworthy and equitable AI integration in Education.

EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT IN THE AGE OF AI: A NARRATIVE REVIEW ON DEFINITIONS AND ETHICAL-LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR TRUSTWORTHY AUTOMATED SYSTEMS

Boccuzzi G.
;
Manganello F.;
2025

Abstract

This study presents a narrative review of scholarly literature at the intersection of education, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and automated assessment algorithms. Acknowledging the pressing need for a unified regulatory framework to enable the safe deployment of AI-based assessment technologies in educational environments, the paper investigates whether a coherent and consistent terminology is employed across academic research. It further compiles and systematizes the ethical and legal principles underpinning the use of such systems, from the Ethical "AI explainability" to the emergent "Right to Explanation" introduced by Article 22 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The review finds that key concepts such as "assessment" and "explainability" are currently used with divergent meanings across disciplines. The analysis identifies transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and non-discrimination as the core principles most frequently emphasized in the literature, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary convergence to ensure trustworthy and equitable AI integration in Education.
2025
Istituto per le Tecnologie Didattiche - ITD - Sede Genova
9789898704689
Artificial Intelligence
Automated Assessment
Ethics
Explainable AI
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ELDL_STE 2025.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 497.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
497.49 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/558561
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact