Implantable vascular devices are becoming increasingly essential in clinical practice, particularly in the management of chronic cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), such as heart failure. These devices enable continuous hemodynamic monitoring, support early interventions, and promote personalized, cost-effective care by providing real-time data that enhance patient outcomes. However, their development and clinical application face significant regulatory and biological challenges. Regulatory frameworks, such as the European Union's Medical Device Regulation, ensure safety, efficacy, and high-quality standards throughout a device's lifecycle. Despite these regulations, intravascular devices interact with vascular tissues and blood, triggering biological responses, such as inflammation and thrombosis, which may impair device functionality, reduce long-term durability, and cause severe adverse events. The bioactive surface of implanted devices initiates inflammatory responses and coagulation, leading to complications like fibrotic encapsulation and vascular injury. After device implantation, endothelial injury promotes platelet activation, thrombus formation, and leukocyte infiltration, compromising both device integration and vascular function. Therefore, the material and structural design of these devices play a crucial role in mitigating thrombotic and inflammatory reactions. This review explores the potential benefits and challenges of vascular implantable devices in the management of chronic CVDs, highlighting regulatory aspects, biological responses, and future clinical perspectives.

The Challenges of Vascular Implants: Regulatory Strategies and Biological Responses

Babboni, Serena
Primo
;
Sicari, Rosa
Secondo
;
Russo, Lara;Basta, Giuseppina
Penultimo
;
Del Turco, Serena
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Implantable vascular devices are becoming increasingly essential in clinical practice, particularly in the management of chronic cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), such as heart failure. These devices enable continuous hemodynamic monitoring, support early interventions, and promote personalized, cost-effective care by providing real-time data that enhance patient outcomes. However, their development and clinical application face significant regulatory and biological challenges. Regulatory frameworks, such as the European Union's Medical Device Regulation, ensure safety, efficacy, and high-quality standards throughout a device's lifecycle. Despite these regulations, intravascular devices interact with vascular tissues and blood, triggering biological responses, such as inflammation and thrombosis, which may impair device functionality, reduce long-term durability, and cause severe adverse events. The bioactive surface of implanted devices initiates inflammatory responses and coagulation, leading to complications like fibrotic encapsulation and vascular injury. After device implantation, endothelial injury promotes platelet activation, thrombus formation, and leukocyte infiltration, compromising both device integration and vascular function. Therefore, the material and structural design of these devices play a crucial role in mitigating thrombotic and inflammatory reactions. This review explores the potential benefits and challenges of vascular implantable devices in the management of chronic CVDs, highlighting regulatory aspects, biological responses, and future clinical perspectives.
2025
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
biomaterials
heart failure
implantable vascular devices
inflammation
regulatory frameworks
thrombosis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SMSC-5-e202500379 definitivo.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: The Challenges of Vascular Implants: Regulatory Strategies and Biological Responses
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.49 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/564384
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact