Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution in urban areas, exposing pedestrians and residents to harmful emissions. Recent works have proposed exposure-aware pedestrian routing strategies based on static emission maps. In this study, we extend this approach to a dynamic, multi-agent simulation framework involving both cars and pedestrians. Starting from the initial fastest-path routing, we simulate the co-evolution of vehicular emissions and pedestrian exposure over multiple steps, where pedestrian flows dynamically influence car emissions, and vice versa. Two routing strategies are explored: global weighting, where a shared trade-off between travel time and exposure is selected, and local weighting, where each trip independently chooses its optimal trade-off. Experiments conducted on real-world urban data from a medium-sized city in Italy demonstrate that both strategies achieve significant reductions in pedestrian exposure; however, they differ in their impact on vehicle emissions and travel times. Global weighting yields more coordinated adaptation but at a higher systemic cost, while local weighting achieves more balanced outcomes with lower disruption. These results provide insights into designing urban routing policies that jointly optimize mobility efficiency and environmental sustainability.

Vehicle-pedestrian optimization framework for exposure-aware routing

Aliyev G.
;
Nanni M.
2025

Abstract

Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution in urban areas, exposing pedestrians and residents to harmful emissions. Recent works have proposed exposure-aware pedestrian routing strategies based on static emission maps. In this study, we extend this approach to a dynamic, multi-agent simulation framework involving both cars and pedestrians. Starting from the initial fastest-path routing, we simulate the co-evolution of vehicular emissions and pedestrian exposure over multiple steps, where pedestrian flows dynamically influence car emissions, and vice versa. Two routing strategies are explored: global weighting, where a shared trade-off between travel time and exposure is selected, and local weighting, where each trip independently chooses its optimal trade-off. Experiments conducted on real-world urban data from a medium-sized city in Italy demonstrate that both strategies achieve significant reductions in pedestrian exposure; however, they differ in their impact on vehicle emissions and travel times. Global weighting yields more coordinated adaptation but at a higher systemic cost, while local weighting achieves more balanced outcomes with lower disruption. These results provide insights into designing urban routing policies that jointly optimize mobility efficiency and environmental sustainability.
2025
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" - ISTI
Emission exposure
Emission-aware routing
Pedestrian routing
Vehicular emissions
Vehicular routing
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s11036-025-02459-4-3.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Published version MONET 2025
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 7.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.05 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
aliyev_nanni_monet_paper_final_v4-4.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Preprint MONET
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 7.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.04 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/568182
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact