Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution in urban areas, exposing pedestrians and residents to harmful emissions. Recent works have proposed exposure-aware pedestrian routing strategies based on static emission maps. In this study, we extend this approach to a dynamic, multi-agent simulation framework involving both cars and pedestrians. Starting from the initial fastest-path routing, we simulate the co-evolution of vehicular emissions and pedestrian exposure over multiple steps, where pedestrian flows dynamically influence car emissions, and vice versa. Two routing strategies are explored: global weighting, where a shared trade-off between travel time and exposure is selected, and local weighting, where each trip independently chooses its optimal trade-off. Experiments conducted on real-world urban data from a medium-sized city in Italy demonstrate that both strategies achieve significant reductions in pedestrian exposure; however, they differ in their impact on vehicle emissions and travel times. Global weighting yields more coordinated adaptation but at a higher systemic cost, while local weighting achieves more balanced outcomes with lower disruption. These results provide insights into designing urban routing policies that jointly optimize mobility efficiency and environmental sustainability.
Vehicle-pedestrian optimization framework for exposure-aware routing
Aliyev G.
;Nanni M.
2025
Abstract
Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution in urban areas, exposing pedestrians and residents to harmful emissions. Recent works have proposed exposure-aware pedestrian routing strategies based on static emission maps. In this study, we extend this approach to a dynamic, multi-agent simulation framework involving both cars and pedestrians. Starting from the initial fastest-path routing, we simulate the co-evolution of vehicular emissions and pedestrian exposure over multiple steps, where pedestrian flows dynamically influence car emissions, and vice versa. Two routing strategies are explored: global weighting, where a shared trade-off between travel time and exposure is selected, and local weighting, where each trip independently chooses its optimal trade-off. Experiments conducted on real-world urban data from a medium-sized city in Italy demonstrate that both strategies achieve significant reductions in pedestrian exposure; however, they differ in their impact on vehicle emissions and travel times. Global weighting yields more coordinated adaptation but at a higher systemic cost, while local weighting achieves more balanced outcomes with lower disruption. These results provide insights into designing urban routing policies that jointly optimize mobility efficiency and environmental sustainability.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
s11036-025-02459-4-3.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Published version MONET 2025
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
7.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
aliyev_nanni_monet_paper_final_v4-4.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Preprint MONET
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
7.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


