The global transition toward responsible research assessment (RRA), formalized by the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA), emphasizes qualitative evaluation over quantitative metrics . Despite broad international support, a significant gap persists between high-level policy commitments and their practical implementation . This study examines the operationalization of ARRA Commitment 2—balancing qualitative judgment with the responsible use of indicators—within career progression procedures at the National Research Council of Italy (CNR) . Following its 2022 signature of the ARRA, CNR launched four competitive calls in 2023 that introduced Narrative CVs and a framework focused on qualitative merit . Through a qualitative content analysis of 4,090 criteria defined by 90 evaluation committees, the research reveals a partial and uneven implementation of these principles . While research outputs are increasingly subject to qualitative assessment, mechanical scoring remains dominant for other contributions, such as teaching and evaluation . The findings highlight heterogeneous interpretations of qualitative assessment across disciplinary clusters and varying levels of guidance provided to committees . Ultimately, the study underscores the challenges of translating reform principles into consistent practice and encourages research organizations to "Evaluate your Evaluation" to better align assessment processes with career development goals .

From Commitment to Practice: Implementing ARRA Commitment 2 in Career Progression Procedures at the National Research Council of Italy

Provost Lottie
;
Di Donato Francesca;Mannocci Andrea;Pecoraro Fabrizio
2026

Abstract

The global transition toward responsible research assessment (RRA), formalized by the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA), emphasizes qualitative evaluation over quantitative metrics . Despite broad international support, a significant gap persists between high-level policy commitments and their practical implementation . This study examines the operationalization of ARRA Commitment 2—balancing qualitative judgment with the responsible use of indicators—within career progression procedures at the National Research Council of Italy (CNR) . Following its 2022 signature of the ARRA, CNR launched four competitive calls in 2023 that introduced Narrative CVs and a framework focused on qualitative merit . Through a qualitative content analysis of 4,090 criteria defined by 90 evaluation committees, the research reveals a partial and uneven implementation of these principles . While research outputs are increasingly subject to qualitative assessment, mechanical scoring remains dominant for other contributions, such as teaching and evaluation . The findings highlight heterogeneous interpretations of qualitative assessment across disciplinary clusters and varying levels of guidance provided to committees . Ultimately, the study underscores the challenges of translating reform principles into consistent practice and encourages research organizations to "Evaluate your Evaluation" to better align assessment processes with career development goals .
2026
Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC
9788890576485
Coara, ARRA, CNR
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/579341
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ente

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact