Facial Expression Analysis (FEA) is a computational approach, crucial for understanding human emotions and mental states, with applications in healthcare, social robotics, and driver-state monitoring. Traditional FEA techniques often rely on Action Units (AUs) and the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), which provide a structured framework but may miss subtle micro-expressions and can become ambiguous in complex or rapidly changing emotional states. Blendshape Features (BFs), originally developed for computer graphics, offer a continuous, high-resolution alternative. This study offers two key contributions: (i) a systematic review of AUs and BFs in FEA research, with a focus on their roles in human-centered applications, and (ii) an expert-validated mapping procedure that links BFs to AUs, integrating the descriptive precision of BFs and the interpretive structure of AUs. The mapping was developed through an independent annotation and consensus process involving ten licensed clinical psychologists and psychotherapists with expertise in analyzing nonverbal behavior. Overall, 88% of mappings reached unanimous agreement among the experts, while 98% were supported by a majority (i.e., 6/10). To our knowledge, this represents one of the first publicly documented efforts toward a standardized mapping between MediaPipe’s 52 blendshape coefficients and AUs. This resource provides a milestone for advancing FEA toward greater expressivity, scalability, and psychological interpretability, with direct implications for behavioral science, clinical diagnostics, humancomputer interaction, and mental health assessment.

Blendshape features meet action units: a clinical mapping for enhancing facial expression analysis

Rosanna Turrisi;Serena Iacono Isidoro;Roberta Bruschetta;Agrippina Campisi;Stefania Aiello;Gaspare Cusimano;Liliana Ruta;Giovanni Pioggia;Gennaro Tartarisco
2026

Abstract

Facial Expression Analysis (FEA) is a computational approach, crucial for understanding human emotions and mental states, with applications in healthcare, social robotics, and driver-state monitoring. Traditional FEA techniques often rely on Action Units (AUs) and the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), which provide a structured framework but may miss subtle micro-expressions and can become ambiguous in complex or rapidly changing emotional states. Blendshape Features (BFs), originally developed for computer graphics, offer a continuous, high-resolution alternative. This study offers two key contributions: (i) a systematic review of AUs and BFs in FEA research, with a focus on their roles in human-centered applications, and (ii) an expert-validated mapping procedure that links BFs to AUs, integrating the descriptive precision of BFs and the interpretive structure of AUs. The mapping was developed through an independent annotation and consensus process involving ten licensed clinical psychologists and psychotherapists with expertise in analyzing nonverbal behavior. Overall, 88% of mappings reached unanimous agreement among the experts, while 98% were supported by a majority (i.e., 6/10). To our knowledge, this represents one of the first publicly documented efforts toward a standardized mapping between MediaPipe’s 52 blendshape coefficients and AUs. This resource provides a milestone for advancing FEA toward greater expressivity, scalability, and psychological interpretability, with direct implications for behavioral science, clinical diagnostics, humancomputer interaction, and mental health assessment.
2026
Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica - IRIB - Sede Secondaria Messina
Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche - IMATI - Sede Secondaria Genova
Blendshape features, facial expression analysis, Action Units, Mapping, Emotions.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/583461
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ente

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact