Popularity bias is the tendency of recommender systems to further suggest popular items while disregarding niche ones, hence giving no chance for items with low popularity to emerge. Although the literature is rich in debiasing techniques, it still lacks quality measures that effectively enable their analyses and comparisons.In this article, we first introduce a formal, data-driven, and parameter-free strategy for classifying items into low, medium, and high popularity categories. Then we introduce Balanced Quality Score (BQS), a quality measure that rewards the debiasing techniques that successfully push a recommender system to suggest niche items, without losing points in its predictive capability in terms of global accuracy.We conduct tests of BQS on three distinct baseline collaborative filtering frameworks: one based on history-embedding and two on user/item-embedding modeling. These evaluations are performed on multiple benchmark datasets and against various state-of-the-art competitors, demonstrating the effectiveness of BQS.
Balanced Quality Score: Measuring Popularity Debiasing in Recommendation
Coppolillo, Erica
Co-primo
;Minici, MarcoCo-primo
;Ritacco, Ettore;Caroprese, Luciano;Pisani, Francesco;Manco, Giuseppe
2024
Abstract
Popularity bias is the tendency of recommender systems to further suggest popular items while disregarding niche ones, hence giving no chance for items with low popularity to emerge. Although the literature is rich in debiasing techniques, it still lacks quality measures that effectively enable their analyses and comparisons.In this article, we first introduce a formal, data-driven, and parameter-free strategy for classifying items into low, medium, and high popularity categories. Then we introduce Balanced Quality Score (BQS), a quality measure that rewards the debiasing techniques that successfully push a recommender system to suggest niche items, without losing points in its predictive capability in terms of global accuracy.We conduct tests of BQS on three distinct baseline collaborative filtering frameworks: one based on history-embedding and two on user/item-embedding modeling. These evaluations are performed on multiple benchmark datasets and against various state-of-the-art competitors, demonstrating the effectiveness of BQS.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
3650043.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.23 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.23 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.