As collaborative robots (cobots) increasingly share workspaces with humans, ensuring safe physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) has become paramount. This systematic review addresses safety assessment in pHRI, focussing on the industrial field, with the objective of collecting approaches and practices developed so far for modelling, simulating, and verifying possible collisions in human–robot collaboration (HRC). To this aim, advances in human–robot collision modelling and test-based safety evaluation over the last fifteen years were examined, identifying six main categories: human body modelling, robot modelling, collision modelling, determining safe limits, approaches for evaluating human–robot contact, and biofidelic sensor development. Despite the reported advancements, several persistent challenges were identified, including the over-reliance on simplified quasi-static models, insufficient exploration of transient contact dynamics, and a lack of inclusivity in demographic data for establishing safety thresholds. This analysis also underscores the limitations of the biofidelic sensors currently used and the need for standardised validation protocols for the impact scenarios identified through risk assessment. By providing a comprehensive overview of the topic, this review aims to inspire researchers to address underexplored areas and foster innovation in developing advanced, but suitable, models to simulate human–robot contact and technologies and methodologies for reliable and user-friendly safety validation approaches. Further deepening those topics, even combined with each other, will bring about the twofold effect of easing the implementation while increasing the safety of robotic applications characterised by pHRI.
Assessing Safety in Physical Human–Robot Interaction in Industrial Settings: A Systematic Review of Contact Modelling and Impact Measuring Methods
Marcello Valori
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Giovanni LegnaniWriting – Review & Editing
;Irene FassiWriting – Review & Editing
2025
Abstract
As collaborative robots (cobots) increasingly share workspaces with humans, ensuring safe physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) has become paramount. This systematic review addresses safety assessment in pHRI, focussing on the industrial field, with the objective of collecting approaches and practices developed so far for modelling, simulating, and verifying possible collisions in human–robot collaboration (HRC). To this aim, advances in human–robot collision modelling and test-based safety evaluation over the last fifteen years were examined, identifying six main categories: human body modelling, robot modelling, collision modelling, determining safe limits, approaches for evaluating human–robot contact, and biofidelic sensor development. Despite the reported advancements, several persistent challenges were identified, including the over-reliance on simplified quasi-static models, insufficient exploration of transient contact dynamics, and a lack of inclusivity in demographic data for establishing safety thresholds. This analysis also underscores the limitations of the biofidelic sensors currently used and the need for standardised validation protocols for the impact scenarios identified through risk assessment. By providing a comprehensive overview of the topic, this review aims to inspire researchers to address underexplored areas and foster innovation in developing advanced, but suitable, models to simulate human–robot contact and technologies and methodologies for reliable and user-friendly safety validation approaches. Further deepening those topics, even combined with each other, will bring about the twofold effect of easing the implementation while increasing the safety of robotic applications characterised by pHRI.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Samarathunga_2025_Assessing Safety in Physical Human–Robot Interaction in Industrial Setting - A Systematic Review.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.8 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.8 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


