Beer quality assessment increasingly requires rapid and scalable analytical tools for product discrimination and authenticity control. In this study, a data-driven metal oxide semiconductor (MOX) chemosensing approach was investigated for the discrimination of commercial lager beers with different alcohol contents and brands. Alcoholic and alcohol-free beer samples from four commercial brands were analyzed using a six-element SnO2-based MOX sensor array, and the resulting response patterns were classified using supervised machinelearning algorithms. Headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC–MS) was employed as a reference technique to characterize volatile organic compound profiles and support the interpretation of sensor-based fingerprints. GC–MS analysis highlighted a shared volatile backbone dominated by fermentationrelated compounds, while also revealing brand- and category-dependent differences in VOC distribution. The MOX sensor array captured these differences as multidimensional volatile fingerprints. Machine-learning models achieved high classification performance in brand-matched alcoholic versus alcohol-free comparisons, with balanced accuracy ranging from 0.937 to 1.000, while brand discrimination within the same category reached balanced accuracy values of 0.875 (alcoholic) and 0.933 (alcohol-free). These results highlight MOXbased chemosensing combined with data-driven analysis as a rapid, portable platform for beer discrimination, with applications in food quality screening, authenticity assessment, and at-line monitoring.

Data-Driven MOX Chemosensing for Beer Discrimination: Towards Rapid Food Quality Screening

Elisabetta Poeta;Estefania Nunez Carmona
;
Veronica Sberveglieri
2026

Abstract

Beer quality assessment increasingly requires rapid and scalable analytical tools for product discrimination and authenticity control. In this study, a data-driven metal oxide semiconductor (MOX) chemosensing approach was investigated for the discrimination of commercial lager beers with different alcohol contents and brands. Alcoholic and alcohol-free beer samples from four commercial brands were analyzed using a six-element SnO2-based MOX sensor array, and the resulting response patterns were classified using supervised machinelearning algorithms. Headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC–MS) was employed as a reference technique to characterize volatile organic compound profiles and support the interpretation of sensor-based fingerprints. GC–MS analysis highlighted a shared volatile backbone dominated by fermentationrelated compounds, while also revealing brand- and category-dependent differences in VOC distribution. The MOX sensor array captured these differences as multidimensional volatile fingerprints. Machine-learning models achieved high classification performance in brand-matched alcoholic versus alcohol-free comparisons, with balanced accuracy ranging from 0.937 to 1.000, while brand discrimination within the same category reached balanced accuracy values of 0.875 (alcoholic) and 0.933 (alcohol-free). These results highlight MOXbased chemosensing combined with data-driven analysis as a rapid, portable platform for beer discrimination, with applications in food quality screening, authenticity assessment, and at-line monitoring.
2026
Istituto di Bioscienze e Biorisorse - IBBR - Sede Secondaria Sesto Fiorentino (FI)
semiconducting metal oxide sensors, volatile organic compounds, non-invasive technology, machine learning, lager beer
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/593569
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ente

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact