This study investigates the performance of upper-limb kinematic reconstruction obtained using a low-cost, skeleton-based markerless motion capture system with RGB cameras, compared to a laboratory-grade markerless reference system. Kinematic data were collected from healthy participants performing selected upper-limb tasks commonly adopted in musculoskeletal rehabilitation protocols. Two camera configurations, i.e., frontal and lateral, were analyzed to evaluate their influence on upper-limb kinematic estimation.Preliminary results indicate that reconstruction accuracy is task- and viewpoint-dependent. For movements primarily occurring in the sagittal plane, the lateral configuration showed improved agreement with the reference system (Mean Absolute Error (MAE) equal to 2.7° in the best case), whereas for smalleramplitude or multi-planar movements the frontal configuration provided more consistent estimates (MAE ranging between 4°- 16° depending on the task and variable).Overall, the observed errors suggest the potential feasibility of low-cost RGB-based setups for upper-limb functional assessment in controlled environments. These findings highlight the importance of camera viewpoint selection and provide preliminary indications for optimizing acquisition setups in clinical and rehabilitation applications.
Viewpoint Effects on Markerless Upper Limb Kinematics During Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Exercises
Umbrico A.;Orlandini A.;Tamantini C.Ultimo
2026
Abstract
This study investigates the performance of upper-limb kinematic reconstruction obtained using a low-cost, skeleton-based markerless motion capture system with RGB cameras, compared to a laboratory-grade markerless reference system. Kinematic data were collected from healthy participants performing selected upper-limb tasks commonly adopted in musculoskeletal rehabilitation protocols. Two camera configurations, i.e., frontal and lateral, were analyzed to evaluate their influence on upper-limb kinematic estimation.Preliminary results indicate that reconstruction accuracy is task- and viewpoint-dependent. For movements primarily occurring in the sagittal plane, the lateral configuration showed improved agreement with the reference system (Mean Absolute Error (MAE) equal to 2.7° in the best case), whereas for smalleramplitude or multi-planar movements the frontal configuration provided more consistent estimates (MAE ranging between 4°- 16° depending on the task and variable).Overall, the observed errors suggest the potential feasibility of low-cost RGB-based setups for upper-limb functional assessment in controlled environments. These findings highlight the importance of camera viewpoint selection and provide preliminary indications for optimizing acquisition setups in clinical and rehabilitation applications.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


